Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 28, 2021. It is now read-only.

renaming calls to include a subprotocol prefix #482

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Nov 10, 2014
Merged

Conversation

debris
Copy link
Contributor

@debris debris commented Nov 6, 2014

jsonrpc calls are now having prefixes so we can easily segment the interface.
restore web3.eth.lll

the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
(at your option) any later version.

ethereum.js is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
GNU General Public License for more details.
GNU Lesser General Public License for more details.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What prompts this change?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it's only for these 2 js files

@subtly
Copy link
Member

subtly commented Nov 6, 2014

Does qt not support binding a nested object?

Ex: bind web3.eth to an Eth interface, web3.shh to Shh interface, etc.

Then we would have 3 flush and consistent interfaces.

@debris
Copy link
Contributor Author

debris commented Nov 7, 2014

To my knowledge, it does not support. The only way to bind nested object is to run javascript.

And right now, we are sharing interface with go client (ethereum.js). Using Qt binding it would be much harder to achieve.

gavofyork pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2014
renaming calls to include a subprotocol prefix
@gavofyork gavofyork merged commit a92bdbd into develop Nov 10, 2014
@debris debris deleted the jsonrpc_interface branch November 12, 2014 12:07
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants