Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Terminal blockhash override #2599

Closed

Conversation

lsankar4033
Copy link
Contributor

@lsankar4033 lsankar4033 commented Sep 15, 2021

Adds a terminal block hash override for the merge fork as originally discussed here.

I'm creating this PR as a starting point for discussion while acknowledging that this might be somewhat controversial (more so than the total difficulty override) because coordinating on a specific blockhash might be perceived as more 'political'.

README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
specs/merge/fork.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@hwwhww hwwhww added the Bellatrix CL+EL Merge label Sep 15, 2021
Copy link
Collaborator

@mkalinin mkalinin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added a few suggestions and comments

specs/merge/client-settings.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specs/merge/client-settings.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specs/merge/fork.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specs/merge/fork-choice.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@djrtwo djrtwo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good 👍 !

Additionally we need to ensure this logic makes it into merge/validator.md

I'll do a final pass when that is added and you get the Hash32() change in there.

@lsankar4033
Copy link
Contributor Author

closing in favor of adding a constant as in #2605 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bellatrix CL+EL Merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants