Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EIP-7549 Clarify network vs on chain aggregation #3628

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 22, 2024

Conversation

mehdi-aouadi
Copy link
Contributor

@mehdi-aouadi mehdi-aouadi commented Mar 20, 2024

I'd like to suggest clarifying the different aggregation levels introduced in #3559: network vs on chain aggregation. IMO it's worth clearly mentioning the "final" aggregation which must be performed by the block proposer since it's the only new step compared to the previous aggregation logic. More details can be found in this note
Inspired by @mkalinin 's note

@mehdi-aouadi mehdi-aouadi changed the title clarify network aggregation vs onchain aggregation clarify network vs on chain aggregation Mar 20, 2024
@mehdi-aouadi mehdi-aouadi changed the title clarify network vs on chain aggregation EIP-7549 Clarify network vs on chain aggregation Mar 20, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@dapplion dapplion left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No opposition to include it. I originally left it out since I felt this function does not add too much, but fine for me to include it. Committed on top some nit formatting changes.

Copy link
Collaborator

@mkalinin mkalinin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@mkalinin mkalinin merged commit 68dceb7 into ethereum:dev Mar 22, 2024
30 checks passed
@mehdi-aouadi mehdi-aouadi deleted the eip-7549-onchain-aggregation branch March 22, 2024 10:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants