Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Predefine do_insert instead of do_delete in erlang_extraction #348

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 18, 2023

Conversation

michallepicki
Copy link
Contributor

@michallepicki michallepicki commented Sep 16, 2023

Because writing the insert function is the secondthird task, I think it's more beneficial as a hint to predefine the private do_ function there so that beginners are not stuck on the different order of arguments. And then we can let the student figure this out on their own for the delete function

Because writing the insert function is the second task,
I think it's more beneficial as a hint to predefine the private do_ function there
so that beginners are not stuck on the different order of arguments.
And then we can let the student figure this out on their own for the delete function
@lpil
Copy link
Member

lpil commented Sep 18, 2023

Ah, this was a mistake. There are not supposed to be any private functions included in the initial file. I'll remove it, thank you

@lpil lpil closed this Sep 18, 2023
@lpil lpil reopened this Sep 18, 2023
@lpil lpil merged commit 08b9ff9 into exercism:main Sep 18, 2023
2 checks passed
@michallepicki michallepicki deleted the patch-1 branch September 18, 2023 15:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants