Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

urlencoded: Support iso-8859-1, utf8 sentinel, and numeric entities #326

Merged
merged 27 commits into from
Jul 30, 2024

Conversation

papandreou
Copy link
Contributor

@papandreou papandreou commented Jul 31, 2018

Fixes #194

Further elaborations here: ljharb/qs#268

Supports both the simple and extended parsers as outlined in ljharb/qs#268 (comment) -- and doesn't use the equivalent capabilities of the qs module.

Note: This will fail in node.js 0.8 and 0.10 as the capability to specify a custom decodeURIComponent implementation to use wasn't added until 0.12.

@dougwilson
Copy link
Contributor

Note: This will fail in node.js 0.8 and 0.10 as the capability to specify a custom decodeURIComponent implementation to use wasn't added until 0.12.

We can hold the PR for the 2.0 release, which will drop support for those versions 👍

@papandreou
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dougwilson, that sounds fair! Does it look good otherwise?

@Lurow
Copy link

Lurow commented Sep 10, 2018

Hi there,

Any news on v2.0 release date with the pr?

Cheers

@thopaw
Copy link

thopaw commented Jan 9, 2019

Any news to iso-8859-1 support?

@papandreou
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fixed conflict with master.

@dougwilson, this has been sitting for some time now 😅

I'm not really in a hurry, but how about getting this released soon? I can remove those ancient node versions from .travis.yml if that would be a help? (I guess it might be a nice occasion to drop more old versions)

@dougwilson
Copy link
Contributor

The reason it has been sitting is just because it cannot be merged into the 1.x line due to the incompatibility. Because this module is a part of express, it effectively inherits it's support policy. The 1.x series of this module won't end up out of support for some time, and the count down starts with the next express release.

In order to reduce the support burden by maintaining multiple major versions of this module, I am just waiting to make the 2.0 in coordination with express 5.

If this could be made to work in those node.js versions I would of course be happy to land right away.

@papandreou
Copy link
Contributor Author

papandreou commented Aug 15, 2019

Okay, thanks for the update, that makes sense!

If this could be made to work in those node.js versions I would of course be happy to land right away.

Unfortunately I think this would involve us to stop relying on the built-in querystring module in simple mode. Either by copying in a newer implementation than the one in 0.10, or by figuring out a way to use the qs module in simple mode as well, disabling the advanced behaviors. That seems a bit far-reaching, unless you were already planning to go in that direction?

@ljharb
Copy link
Contributor

ljharb commented Aug 15, 2019

@papandreou if there's manageable changes i could make in qs that would allow body-parser to switch to it for everything, i'm willing to make those.

@dougwilson
Copy link
Contributor

And I would be happy to use qs for everything here as well. The downside to using querystring for the simple parser is that since it ships as part of Node.js core, the results of this module will vary by both the version of this module and the version of Node.js (vs only varying by the version of this module).

@ljharb
Copy link
Contributor

ljharb commented Aug 16, 2019

@dougwilson if you can save me a few minutes and link me to a branch that uses qs for the simple parser, but is failing tests, i can use npm link and see what options and changes it would take to get it working :-D 🙏

@dougwilson
Copy link
Contributor

@ljharb this is likely not even correct for params to qs (I passed depth: -1 since 0 is not the right behavior, but idk), but it's at least something that should help :)

Branch: https://github.com/expressjs/body-parser/tree/urlencoded-qs-simple
Test: npm i && npm test -- --grep=bodyParser.urlencoded

@ljharb
Copy link
Contributor

ljharb commented Aug 16, 2019

give me 48 hours, i'll see what i can do

@ljharb
Copy link
Contributor

ljharb commented Aug 16, 2019

body-parser tests on that branch now pass with ljharb/qs#326 (comment), and I can merge and release that in qs as soon as I've convinced myself what semver it is.

@dougwilson
Copy link
Contributor

Ah, yes, so depth: 0 was supposed to make sense after all :D . Yes, that is a hard decision. But if it helps at all, this module and Express do not directly expose the qs arguments, making whichever semver it is a non issue to us :)

@ljharb
Copy link
Contributor

ljharb commented Aug 16, 2019

What I'm probably leaning towards is releasing it as a minor, and if users report breakage, reverting the depth 0 part, but keeping the depth false part - so express thus should use depth false to ensure continuity.

@ljharb
Copy link
Contributor

ljharb commented Aug 17, 2019

v6.8.0 of qs is published.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

iso-8859-1/windows-1252 support?
8 participants