-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: loosen TC activity rules #5510
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we can hold off for now, with a fast follow in Season 0 to firm this up.
The penalty for inactivity requires a PR to be opened to remove someone who has not met the attendance criteria, and does not choose to resign. (it is also not spelled out WHO can open or approve that PR hehe)
I am confident that the current TC will not inactive someone if they miss the next couple meetings.
Churn in these policies need to be avoided lest we hinder their gravity. Let's make sure that the next change we make to this clause is one that balances our goals here of encouraging activity/showing up, and accomodating people's lives as this is a volunteer position. As well as choosing language we won't have to touch again for a long time unless something drastic changes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A first stab from me:
The bolded part here is something that we can omit, but should definitely be broached and put into writing. Im guessing we could strike that rule, and would have to depending on how "official decisions" are defined. Is merging a PR an official decision? No. Accepting a new TC member? Yes. Emptying the (nonexistent) bank account? Yes. Merging a PR to drop Node version support outside of agreed to timelines? Yes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh I like this more detailed version!