Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: IntOrString supports null values #4078

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 21, 2022

Conversation

manusa
Copy link
Member

@manusa manusa commented Apr 21, 2022

Description

fix: IntOrString supports null values

  • For backwards compatibility, IntOrString should still support
    null values.

Relates to:

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change
  • Chore (non-breaking change which doesn't affect codebase;
    test, version modification, documentation, etc.)

Checklist

  • Code contributed by me aligns with current project license: Apache 2.0
  • I Added CHANGELOG entry regarding this change
  • I have implemented unit tests to cover my changes
  • I have added/updated the javadocs and other documentation accordingly
  • No new bugs, code smells, etc. in SonarCloud report
  • I tested my code in Kubernetes
  • I tested my code in OpenShift

@manusa manusa added this to the 6.0.0 milestone Apr 21, 2022
- For backwards compatibility, IntOrString should still support
null values.

Signed-off-by: Marc Nuri <marc@marcnuri.com>
@rohanKanojia
Copy link
Member

Why are we doing this? Did someone reported this issue? Was it breaking some deserialization ?

@manusa
Copy link
Member Author

manusa commented Apr 21, 2022

Why are we doing this? Did someone reported this issue? Was it breaking some deserialization ?

It breaks lots of stuff in JKube. In addition, it also makes sense that if you have a public empty constructor which leaves the value as null, that you can actually pass a null argument to the other constructor too.

So considering that this is harmless, the resulting object instance can also be achieved via the other constructor, and that it makes the changes backwards-compatible, IMHO we should keep it this way.

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Apr 21, 2022

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

100.0% 100.0% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@manusa manusa merged commit cede6aa into fabric8io:master Apr 21, 2022
@manusa manusa deleted the fix/int-or-string branch April 21, 2022 11:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants