Add example on how to use union types on TM #36927
Closed
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary:
This change is an alternative to show how to use union types in TM without generating union types natively.
The goal is to enable using unions in the JS layer, without compromising the Native typesafety.
If this approach is a good middle-ground, we can remove the MixedTypeAnnotation and migrate to this approach.
Changelog:
[General][Added] - Add example on Union types for Turbomodules
Differential Revision: D45045552