-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[compiler] Fix assignment within for update expression #30067
Merged
josephsavona
merged 3 commits into
gh/josephsavona/32/base
from
gh/josephsavona/32/head
Jun 24, 2024
Merged
[compiler] Fix assignment within for update expression #30067
josephsavona
merged 3 commits into
gh/josephsavona/32/base
from
gh/josephsavona/32/head
Jun 24, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
When converting value blocks from HIR to ReactiveFunction, we have to drop StoreLocal assignments that represent the assignment of the phi, since ReactiveFunction supports compound expressions. These StoreLocals are only present to represent the conditional assignment of the value itself - but it's also possible for the expression to have contained an assignment expression. Before, in trying to strip the first category of StoreLocal we also accidentally stripped the second category. Now we check that the assignment is for a temporary, and don't strip otherwise. [ghstack-poisoned]
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
josephsavona
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 24, 2024
When converting value blocks from HIR to ReactiveFunction, we have to drop StoreLocal assignments that represent the assignment of the phi, since ReactiveFunction supports compound expressions. These StoreLocals are only present to represent the conditional assignment of the value itself - but it's also possible for the expression to have contained an assignment expression. Before, in trying to strip the first category of StoreLocal we also accidentally stripped the second category. Now we check that the assignment is for a temporary, and don't strip otherwise. ghstack-source-id: cdb81880f29d5be3313086bd9e3fcfef9db0f85e Pull Request resolved: #30067
facebook-github-bot
added
CLA Signed
React Core Team
Opened by a member of the React Core Team
labels
Jun 24, 2024
Comparing: c21bcd6...6eb2374 Critical size changesIncludes critical production bundles, as well as any change greater than 2%:
Significant size changesIncludes any change greater than 0.2%: Expand to show
|
When converting value blocks from HIR to ReactiveFunction, we have to drop StoreLocal assignments that represent the assignment of the phi, since ReactiveFunction supports compound expressions. These StoreLocals are only present to represent the conditional assignment of the value itself - but it's also possible for the expression to have contained an assignment expression. Before, in trying to strip the first category of StoreLocal we also accidentally stripped the second category. Now we check that the assignment is for a temporary, and don't strip otherwise. [ghstack-poisoned]
josephsavona
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 24, 2024
When converting value blocks from HIR to ReactiveFunction, we have to drop StoreLocal assignments that represent the assignment of the phi, since ReactiveFunction supports compound expressions. These StoreLocals are only present to represent the conditional assignment of the value itself - but it's also possible for the expression to have contained an assignment expression. Before, in trying to strip the first category of StoreLocal we also accidentally stripped the second category. Now we check that the assignment is for a temporary, and don't strip otherwise. ghstack-source-id: 3f18fe0a9ee8cb0e99e49dbdfa175f4ce7239377 Pull Request resolved: #30067
Fixes #29956 |
When converting value blocks from HIR to ReactiveFunction, we have to drop StoreLocal assignments that represent the assignment of the phi, since ReactiveFunction supports compound expressions. These StoreLocals are only present to represent the conditional assignment of the value itself - but it's also possible for the expression to have contained an assignment expression. Before, in trying to strip the first category of StoreLocal we also accidentally stripped the second category. Now we check that the assignment is for a temporary, and don't strip otherwise. [ghstack-poisoned]
josephsavona
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 24, 2024
When converting value blocks from HIR to ReactiveFunction, we have to drop StoreLocal assignments that represent the assignment of the phi, since ReactiveFunction supports compound expressions. These StoreLocals are only present to represent the conditional assignment of the value itself - but it's also possible for the expression to have contained an assignment expression. Before, in trying to strip the first category of StoreLocal we also accidentally stripped the second category. Now we check that the assignment is for a temporary, and don't strip otherwise. ghstack-source-id: e7759c963bbc1bbff2d3230534b049199e3262ad Pull Request resolved: #30067
mofeiZ
approved these changes
Jun 24, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes sense!
josephsavona
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 24, 2024
When converting value blocks from HIR to ReactiveFunction, we have to drop StoreLocal assignments that represent the assignment of the phi, since ReactiveFunction supports compound expressions. These StoreLocals are only present to represent the conditional assignment of the value itself - but it's also possible for the expression to have contained an assignment expression. Before, in trying to strip the first category of StoreLocal we also accidentally stripped the second category. Now we check that the assignment is for a temporary, and don't strip otherwise. ghstack-source-id: e7759c963bbc1bbff2d3230534b049199e3262ad Pull Request resolved: #30067
This was referenced Jul 25, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
When converting value blocks from HIR to ReactiveFunction, we have to drop StoreLocal assignments that represent the assignment of the phi, since ReactiveFunction supports compound expressions. These StoreLocals are only present to represent the conditional assignment of the value itself - but it's also possible for the expression to have contained an assignment expression. Before, in trying to strip the first category of StoreLocal we also accidentally stripped the second category. Now we check that the assignment is for a temporary, and don't strip otherwise.