Hanqing Zeng, Muhan Zhang, Yinglong Xia, Ajitesh Srivastava, Andrey Malevich, Rajgopal Kannan, Viktor Prasanna, Long Jin, Ren Chen
Contact: Hanqing Zeng (zengh@usc.edu)
(Note: There is an old version named "Deep Graph Neural Networks with Shallow Subgraph Samplers". Please only refer to the new version and disgard the old one. )
- Major updates (code refactoring; link prediction support; all training configs) released in Jan 2022.
- We thank the DGL team for including the shaDow k-hop sampler in their library.
- shaDow-GNN paper accepted to NeurIPS'21!
- We thank the Pytorch Geometric team for including the shaDow k-hop sampler in their library.
We propose a design principle of "decoupling the depth and scope" when constructing GNN models. This is a simple way to surpass 1-WL, overcome oversmoothing and avoid neighborhood explosion at the same time.
We call the practical implementation of our design principle as shaDow-GNN (Deep GNNs on shallow subgraphs).
This repo implements:
- 6 backbone message passing layers (GCN, GraphSAGE, GIN, GAT, JK-Net, SGC)
- 4 pooling layers (sort, max, mean, sum)
- 4 subgraph extractors / sampler (IID node, k-hop, PPR, stochastic PPR)
- Pre-processing (feature smoothening; label propagation)
- Post-processing (C&S)
- Subgraph ensemble (either during training or post-processing)
This repo supports:
- Inductive node classification (
Flickr
,Reddit
,Yelp
) - Transductive node classification (
ogbn-arxiv
,ogbn-products
,ogbn-papers100M
) - Link prediction (
ogbl-collab
)
The training pipeline of shaDow-GNN can be abstracted as three major steps:
Expand to see details...
The preprocessing steps may augment the input node features with
- Smoothened node features
- Ground-truth labels in the training set
The first point is similar to what SGC and SIGN did (it's just we convert the original algorithm into the shaDow version). The second point is inspired by the methods on the OGB leaderboard (only applicable under the transductive setting).
Note: preprocessing is turned off in all experiment in our main paper.
All shaDow-GNN are trained in the minibatch fashion. For each training batch, we first perform subgraph extraction, and then build a multi-layer GNN on the subgraph to perform message passing.
For any nodes u
and v
in the same batch, we treat the two subgraphs as completely isolated. i.e., when a node w
of the original graph is included in both subgraphs, we rename w
of u
's subgraph as w1
and w
of v
's subgraph as w2
so that the two subgraphs don't talk to each other. See _node_induced_subgraph()
function in para_graph_sampler/graph_engine/backend/ParallelSampler.cpp
.
Note: unlike other graph sampling based methods, shaDow-GNN allows much smaller batch size (can be as small as 1) since the subgraph degree of shaDow-GNN does not drop with batch size. This property makes shaDow-GNN easily portable on GPUs of limited memory.
Expand to see details...
After the training is finished, we can reload the stored checkpoint to perform the following post-processing steps: * *C&S* (transductive only): we borrow the DGL implementation of C&S to perform smoothening of the predictions generated by shaDow-GNN. * *Ensemble*: Ensemble can be done either in an "end-to-end" fashion during the above training step, or as a postprocessing step.
Due to its flexibility in minibatching, shaDow-GNN requires the minimum hardware for training and inference computation. Most of our experiments can be run on a desktop machine. Even the largest graph of 111 million nodes can be trained on a low-end server.
The main computation operations include:
- Subgraph extraction / sampling: parallelized on CPU by C++ and OpenMP.
- GNN model propagation: accelerated on GPU via PyTorch.
We summarize the recommended minimum hardware spec for the three OGB graphs:
Graph | Num. nodes | CPU cores | CPU RAM | GPU memory |
---|---|---|---|---|
ogbn-arxiv | 0.2M | 4 | 8GB | 4GB |
ogbn-products | 2.4M | 4 | 32GB | 4GB |
ogbn-papers100M | 111.1M | 4 | 128GB | 4GB |
When you run shaDow-GNN for the first time, we will convert the graph data from the OGB or GraphSAINT format into the shaDow-GNN format.
The converted data files are (by default) stored in the ./data/<graph_name>
directory.
NOTE: the initial data conversion may take a while for large graphs (e.g., for ogbn-papers100M). Please be patient.
Expand to see details if you want to prepare your own dataset
We briefly describe the shaDow data format. You should not need to worry about the details unless you want to prepare your own dataset. Each graph is defined by the following files:
adj_full_raw.npz
/adj_full_raw.npy
: The adjacency matrix of the full graph (consisting of all the train / valid / test nodes). It can either be a*.npz
file of typescipy.sparse.csr_matrix
, or a*.npy
file containing the dictionary{'indptr': numpy.ndarray, 'indices': numpy.ndarray, 'data': numpy.ndarray}
.adj_train_raw.npz
/adj_train_raw.npy
: The adjacency matrix induced by all training nodes (ONLY used in inductive learning).label_full.npy
: Thenumpy.ndarray
representing the labels of all the train / valid / test nodes. If this matrix is 2D, then a row is a one-hot encoding of the label(s) of a node. If this is 1D, then an element is the label index of a node. In any case, the first dimension equals the total number of nodes.feat_full.npy
: Thenumpy.ndarray
representing the node features. The first dimension of the matrix equals the total number of nodes.split.npy
: The file stores a dictionary representing the train / valid / test splitting. The keys are train / valid / test. The values arenumpy
array of the node indices for the corresponding split.- (Optional)
adj_full_undirected.npy
: This is a cache file storing the graph after convertingadj_full_raw
into undirected (e.g., the raw graph ofogbn-arxiv
is directed). - (Optional)
adj_train_undirected.npy
: Similar as above. Converted fromadj_train_raw
into undirected. - (Optional)
cpp/adj_<full|train>_<indices|indptr|data>.bin
: These are the cache files for the C++ sampler. We store the corresponding*.npy
/*.npz
files as binary files so that the C++ sampler can directly load the graph without going through the layer of PyBind11 (see below). For gigantic graphs such asogbn-papers100M
, the conversion fromnumpy.ndarray
to C++vector
seems to be slow (maybe an issue of PyBind11). - (Optional)
ppr_float/<neighs|scores>_<transductive|inductive>_<ppr params>.bin
: These are the cache files for the C++ PPR sampler. We store the PPR values and node indices for the close neighbors of each target as the external binary files. Therefore, we do not need to run PPR multiple times when we perform parameter tuning (even through running PPR from scratch is still much cheaper than the model training).
To train shaDow-GNN on the 7 graphs evaluated in the paper:
- For the 4 OGB graphs (i.e.,
ogbn-arxiv
,ogbn-products
,ogbn-papers100M
), you don't need to manually download anything. Just execute the training command (see below). - For the 3 other graphs (i.e.,
Flickr
,Reddit
,Yelp
), the source data files are listed in the official GraphSAINT repo. Please manually download from the link provided by GraphSAINT, and place all the downloaded files under the./data/saint/<graph name>/
directory.- E.g., for
Flickr
, the directory should look something like (note the lower case for graph name)
- E.g., for
data/
└───saint/
└───flickr/
└───adj_full.npz
class_map.json
...
The script for converting from OGB / SAINT into shaDow format is ./para_graph_sampler/graph_engine/frontend/data_converter.py
. It is automatically invoked when you run training for the first time.
Clone the repo by (you need the --recursive
flag to download pybind11
as submodule):
git clone <URL FOR THIS REPO> --recursive
Step 0: Make sure you create a virtual environment with Python 3.8 (lower version of python may not work. The version we use is 3.8.5).
Step 1: We need PyBind11 to link the C++ based sampler with the PyTorch based trainer. The ./para_graph_sampler/graph_engine/backend/ParallelSampler.*
contain the C++ code for the PPR and k-hop samplers. The ./para_graph_sampler/graph_engine/backend/pybind11/
directory contains a copy of PyBind11.
Before training, we need to build the C++ sampler as a python package, so that it can be directly imported by the PyTorch trainer (just like we import any other python module). To do so, you need to install the following:
cmake
(our version is 3.18.2. Can be installed byconda install -c anaconda cmake
)ninja
(our version is 1.10.2. Can be installed byconda install -c conda-forge ninja
)pybind11
(our version is 2.6.2. Can be installed bypip install pybind11
)OpenMP
: normally openmp should already be included in the C++ compiler. If not, you may need to install it manually based on your C++ compiler version.
Then build the sampler. Run the following in your terminal
cd para_graph_sampler
bash install.sh
cd ..
On Windows machine, you could instead replace the bash install.sh
command by .\install.bat
.
Step 2: Install all the other Python packages in your virtual environment.
- pytorch==1.7.1 (CUDA 11)
- Pytorch Geometric and its dependency packages (torch-scatter, torch-sparse, etc.)
- Follow the official instructions (see the "Installation via Binaries" section)
- We also explicitly use the
torch_scatter
functions to perform some graph operations for shaDow.
- ogb>=1.2.4
- dgl>=0.5.3 (only used by the postprocessing of C&S). Can be installed by
pip
orconda
. See the official instruction - numpy>=1.19.2
- scipy>=1.6.0
- scikit-learn>=0.24.0
- pyyaml>=5.4.1
- argparse
- tqdm
(Optional) Step 3: Record your system information. We use the CONFIG.yml
file to keep track of the meta information of your hardware / software system. Copy CONFIG_TEMPLATE.yml
and name it CONFIG.yml
. Edit the fields based on your machine specs.
In most cases, the only thing you need to overwrite is the max_threads
field. This is used to control the parallelism of the C++ sampler. You can also set it to -1
so that OpenMP will automatically decide the number of threads for you.
Step 4: Now you should be able to run the training / inference. In general, just type:
python -m shaDow.main --configs <your config *.yml file> --dataset <name of the graph> --gpu <index of the available GPU>
where the *.yml
file specifies all the hyperparameters (e.g., GNN architecture, sampler, etc.). The name of the graph should correspond to the sub-directory name under ./data/
(we use all lowercase and omit the ogbn-
or ogbl-
prefix).
Step 5 Check the logs of the training. We use the following protocol for logging. Our principle is to enable complete reproductivity of the previous runs.
- Each run gets its own subdirectory in the format of
./<log dir>/<data>/<running|done|crashed|killed>/<timestamp>-<githash>/...
, where the subdirectory indicates the status of the run:running/
: the training is still in progress.finished/
: the training finishes normally. The logs will be moved fromrunning/
tofinished/
.killed/
: the training is killed (e.g., by CTRL-C).crashed/
: the training crashes (e.g., bugs in the code, GPU / CPU out-of-memory, etc.).
- In the subdirectory we should find the following files:
*.yml
: a copy of the*.yml
file to launch the trainingepoch_<train|valid|test>.csv
: CSV file logging the accuracy and loss of each epochfinal.csv
: CSV file logging the final accuracy on the full train / valid / test sets.- pytorch checkpoint: the model weights and optimizer states.
We first describe the command for a single run. At the end of this section, we show the wrapper script for repeating the same configuration multiple times.
The configs are under ./config_train/<dataset>/<vanilla|pool>/<arch>_<depth>_<sampler>.yml
, where
dataset
corresponds to the 5 graphs in Table 1:flickr
,reddit
,yelp
,arxiv
,products
.vanilla
means no subgraph pooling is performed. So we take the target node embedding for classification and disgard embeddings for all other subgraph nodes.pool
means we add an extra subgraph pooling layer onto the vanilla arch. Table 1 only evaluatedmean
andmax
pooling. You can also trysort
andsum
.arch
in Table 1 is restricted togcn
,sage
andgat
. Figure 3 corresponds tosgc
and Table 12 corresponds togin
.depth
in Table 1 is either 3 or 5.sampler
is chosen fromppr
andkhop
.
Note: for ogbn-products
, since its test set is especially large, you can skip evaluating test accuracy during training by additional flags. e.g.,
python -m shaDow.main --configs config_train/products/pool/gat_3_ppr.yml --dataset products --gpu <gpu idx> --log_test_convergence -1 --nocache test
Run:
python -m shaDow.main --configs config_train/papers100M/leaderboard/gat_ppr.yml --dataset papers100M --gpu <gpu idx>
Run:
python -m shaDow.main --configs config_train/collab/leaderboard/sage_ppr.yml --dataset collab --gpu <gpu idx>
Expand to see details
Table 1 results are all repeated 5 times. Table 2 and 3 results are repeated 10 times. All without fixing random seeds. In C++, not fixing random seed is achieved by `std::srand(std::time(0))` in `para_graph_sampler/graph_engine/backend/ParallelSampler.h`.
We also provide a wrapper script for repeat the training. See ./scripts/train_multiple_runs.py
.
General command:
python scripts/train_multiple_runs.py --dataset <dataset> --configs <config yml> --gpu <gpu idx> --repetition 10
where all the command line arguments of train_multiple_runs.py
are the same as the original training script (i.e., the shaDow.main
module). The only additional flag is --repetition
.
NOTE: the wrapper script uses python subprocess to launch multiple runs. There seems to be some issue on redirecting the print-out messages of the training subprocess. It may appear that the program stucks without any outputs. This is due to the buffering of output. However, the training should actually be running in the background. You can check the corresponding log files in the running/
directory to see the accuracy per epoch being updated.
shaDow-GNN is released under an MIT license. Find out more about it here.
NeurIPS 2021
@inproceedings{
shaDow,
title={Decoupling the Depth and Scope of Graph Neural Networks},
author={Hanqing Zeng and Muhan Zhang and Yinglong Xia and Ajitesh Srivastava and Andrey Malevich and Rajgopal Kannan and Viktor Prasanna and Long Jin and Ren Chen},
booktitle={Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},
editor={A. Beygelzimer and Y. Dauphin and P. Liang and J. Wortman Vaughan},
year={2021},
url={https://openreview.net/forum?id=d0MtHWY0NZ}
}