Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update(userspace): minor improvements on the plugin framework #1100

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 17, 2023

Conversation

jasondellaluce
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

/kind cleanup

/kind design

Any specific area of the project related to this PR?

/area libsinsp

Does this PR require a change in the driver versions?

What this PR does / why we need it:

This polishes some inconsistencies in the plugin API and solves a data race in the async event handler of libsinsp.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

update(userspace): minor improvements on the plugin framework

Signed-off-by: Jason Dellaluce <jasondellaluce@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Dellaluce <jasondellaluce@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Dellaluce <jasondellaluce@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Dellaluce <jasondellaluce@gmail.com>
@jasondellaluce
Copy link
Contributor Author

/milestone 0.11.0

@poiana poiana added this to the 0.11.0 milestone May 17, 2023
@poiana poiana requested review from hbrueckner and Molter73 May 17, 2023 13:37
if (cur_async_handler)
{
delete cur_async_handler;
m_async_evt_handler.store(nullptr);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't we first store nullptr (so that others threads loading it will get nullptr) and then delete the pointer?
Otherwise another thread could load the handler after we removed it but before we stored nullptr.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since this happens in the destructor of the plugin, we'd be in much trouble if another thread from the plugin code is still running. Also because we'd already unloaded the dynamic library. However, event though this is an unreachable case the suggestion is right and I applied just in case ❤️

Andreagit97
Andreagit97 previously approved these changes May 17, 2023
Copy link
Member

@Andreagit97 Andreagit97 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@poiana
Copy link
Contributor

poiana commented May 17, 2023

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 8ea56f56f727f7ea0368bd5e548637b702967c96

Co-authored-by: Federico Di Pierro <nierro92@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Dellaluce <jasondellaluce@gmail.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@FedeDP FedeDP left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@poiana
Copy link
Contributor

poiana commented May 17, 2023

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: d387d117c61a0ae01be48c89e5bcbc459805e878

Copy link
Member

@Andreagit97 Andreagit97 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@poiana
Copy link
Contributor

poiana commented May 17, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Andreagit97, FedeDP, jasondellaluce

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [Andreagit97,FedeDP,jasondellaluce]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@poiana poiana merged commit 0b9ca98 into master May 17, 2023
@poiana poiana deleted the update/minor-plugin-improvements branch May 17, 2023 14:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants