Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bugfix: Re-applying of featuresets does not update label changes #857

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 2, 2020

Conversation

terryyylim
Copy link
Member

What this PR does / why we need it:
Currently, when we reapply featuresets to add/remove labels from featureset or features, the changes made to labels are not propagated.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

@terryyylim
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

*
* @param featureSpec {@link FeatureSpec} containing schema changes.
*/
public void updateFromProto(FeatureSpec featureSpec) {
this.setLabels(TypeConversion.convertMapToJsonString(featureSpec.getLabelsMap()));
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

shouldn't we apply update after isArchived check?

@@ -314,9 +314,10 @@ public void updateFromProto(FeatureSetProto.FeatureSet featureSetProto)
spec.getEntitiesList(), existingEntities));
}

// 4. Update max age and source.
// 4. Update max age, source and labels.
maxAgeSeconds = spec.getMaxAge().getSeconds();
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

could please add this. here as well

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

adding for source as well.

@@ -314,9 +314,10 @@ public void updateFromProto(FeatureSetProto.FeatureSet featureSetProto)
spec.getEntitiesList(), existingEntities));
}

// 4. Update max age and source.
// 4. Update max age, source and labels.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks like numbering is broken. should be 2.

@terryyylim
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

2 similar comments
@terryyylim
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@terryyylim
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@feast-ci-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: pyalex, terryyylim

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@pyalex
Copy link
Collaborator

pyalex commented Jul 2, 2020

/lgtm

@feast-ci-bot feast-ci-bot merged commit 000982a into feast-dev:master Jul 2, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants