Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: bump fedimint to post 0.4.3 #568

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 22, 2024

Conversation

Kodylow
Copy link
Member

@Kodylow Kodylow commented Oct 21, 2024

Bumping to continue 0.5 UI development

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the input reference for the fedimint repository to a specific commit for improved stability.
    • Modified the way overlays are referenced to enhance functionality.
    • Added comments to maintain synchronization of build dependencies.

@Kodylow Kodylow requested review from a team as code owners October 21, 2024 23:49
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 21, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
ui ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 21, 2024 11:49pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 21, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the flake.nix file by updating the input reference for the fedimint repository from a specific tag to a commit hash. It also changes the way overlays are referenced, shifting from a single overlay to an array of overlays. The yarnOfflineCache section remains functionally unchanged but includes a comment about maintaining the sha256 hash in sync with yarn.lock. Other sections, such as devShells and packages.guardian-ui, retain their existing structure and functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
flake.nix Updated fedimint input reference from tag to commit hash; changed overlays from single to array.

Possibly related PRs

  • chore: fix and bump #536: This PR updates the fedimint input reference in flake.nix, which is directly related to the changes made in the main PR that also involve updating the fedimint input reference from a specific tag to a commit hash.

Suggested reviewers

  • bradleystachurski

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 53ff901 and 51b59d0.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • flake.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • flake.nix (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
flake.nix (2)

5-5: Verify commit hash intention.

The fedimint input is now pinned to a specific commit. Ensure this is intentional and not a development version.


13-13: Check impact of all overlays.

Using all overlays might introduce unintended changes. Verify this doesn't affect the build negatively.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@dpc dpc merged commit 3af06a8 into fedimint:master Oct 22, 2024
3 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants