-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 165
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FOP - New miner terminology proposal #127
Comments
Well written. +1 on the new branding. |
We thought about that, but considering a Filecoin architecture can exist of
1 or multiple compute and storage servers, the feedback was that the word
"system" would be more encompassing of all the configurations. A Storage
server would only call out a single server.
…On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 9:48 PM Tim Guo(柏礼) ***@***.***> wrote:
Great proposal, just one concern about:
Miner Rig Storage System Storage System
The storage system may not reflect the machines or equipments behind it.
Can we use *Storage Server* instead?
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#127 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AT56QDJPBXEPUN475UFJWTTTZY3BVANCNFSM5BBD6BWA>
.
|
|
This is a fantastic proposal -- kudos to @Stefaan-V -- PiKNiK has been using these terminologies unofficially for several months. In our experience, the broader tech market is far more receptive to this neutral language. Suggestion: Change Filecoin --> "FIL Network" |
👍🏻 Please create another FIP as this term is not directly miner operation related. |
Yeah, great ideas here and think it would help the network to rebrand anything related to Mining to Storage Provider, etc. I think it would level set both clients and potential Storage Providers that FIL just isn't some crypto currency get rich scheme but a true infrastructure of distributed storage supplied by professional technologists. Leaving references to 'mining' definitely implies the wrong connotation for where the network wants to sit. |
This is a Chinese version of the new terminology created by StorSwift team. It's for reference only. |
Any other opinions out there on this topic? |
I'm planning to rebrand https://miner.report/ to https://provider.quest/ (it will take some time, there are a lot of references to rename) I strongly agree with this. "Crypto Mining" is entering the popular lexicon via the news cycle and is becoming closely associated with Bitcoin and wasteful environmental practices as well as a lot of scam behaviour. It will be easier to portray Filecoin as one of the "good guys" if different language is adopted. |
Closing due the passage of FIP-0018 |
Summary
This proposal describes a change to rebrand the existing ‘miner’ references in marketing assets, documentation, communication channels and UX interfaces to a new definition called 'Storage Providers'. With this new proposal we are moving towards a naming convention that better represents our community partners that provide the storage infrastructure and services to the Filecoin network. This change will also help in highlighting the usefulness of the Filecoin network and is a start of a series of gradual changes we are proposing to help the network in creating a new narrative. We welcome feedback and input on the proposed changes below.
Change Motivation
No blockchain is the same. Every single blockchain network comes with unique characteristics and incentive mechanisms that drive a prosperous community and implement a long-term sustaining strategy.
Filecoin's long-term vision has always been to create a decentralized, efficient and robust foundation for humanity’s most valuable data. To support this vision, we are relying on a wide network of community members that provide and commit storage to the Filecoin network, currently referred to as the Filecoin miners.
With Filecoin’s rapid storage growth and adoption of web3 applications, the community and the extended ecosystem members are requesting a branding change in how to position the miners.
The main reasons are:
The Proposal
Input & Feedback
This proposal includes input gathered from feedback sessions with miners in the storage provider working groups and ecosystem partners.
The goal was to rename a subset of the current miner related terminologies and replace them with a proposal that better describes the current activities and the value creation to the network. The initial feedback we received from the community has been in favor of this new change.
The New Terminology Mapping
The following table highlights in more detail the terminology mapping.
The New Terminology Mapping
**Once the community reaches consensus, we ask all participants in the Filecoin ecosystem to update any miner_ID references to Storage Provider_ID in the UX interfaces.
The following table highlights in more detail the description of these new terms.
What content assets will be updated?
With the support of the community, we will start using the new terminology in newly created marketing assets. In the next couple of weeks and months we also suggest to update the following websites and assets and promote the new terminology where possible.
List of existing assets/websites we propose to update over time
We ask the Filecoin community to adopt and help communicate these new changes to the market. Once we reached consensus, we also ask the community to update the community tools and marketing assets to include these new naming proposals.
The journey ahead
We understand this change doesn't happen in a day and it will be a multi-phased approach of content iterations and messaging adjustments across the whole ecosystem. This is the first phase of this journey that will take the full community to participate.
The Filecoin long-term strategy is to continue to educate the mainstream market and create awareness on the benefits of the network and how a distributed and decentralized architecture differentiates from the centralized solutions of the Web2 world.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: