Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FRC DealProposal integration #1216

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 3, 2023
Merged

Conversation

nonsense
Copy link
Member

@nonsense nonsense commented Feb 23, 2023

An initial DealProposal FRC has been merged into Boost already. This PR is a follow-up to solidify the remaining items as described in #1215 as well as any changes that might come up in the actual FRC.


TODO:

  • test with local devnet - tested with lotus v1.20.0-rc2-boost
  • ideally add an itest which exercises the current agreed-upon contract/ABI and we detect properly the event on boost side

@nonsense nonsense force-pushed the nonsense/frc-dealproposal-integration branch 3 times, most recently from 747d9d7 to c665e56 Compare March 1, 2023 16:47
@nonsense nonsense marked this pull request as ready for review March 1, 2023 16:49
@nonsense nonsense force-pushed the nonsense/frc-dealproposal-integration branch from c665e56 to 97b2677 Compare March 2, 2023 13:55
@nonsense nonsense requested review from dirkmc and LexLuthr March 2, 2023 18:55
p1ClientID == p2ClientID, nil
p1ClientID == p2ClientID

log.Warnw("check deal quality", "result", res, "p1clientid", p1ClientID, "p2clientid", p2ClientID, "label_equality", p1.Label.Equals(p2.Label), "provider_equality", p1.Provider == p2.Provider)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe log this at the debug level

storagemarket/helper.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@nonsense nonsense merged commit f05f7de into main Mar 3, 2023
@nonsense nonsense deleted the nonsense/frc-dealproposal-integration branch March 3, 2023 15:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants