Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v1.0.0/filclient-commp-fix branch + patch #680

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 4, 2022

Conversation

rvagg
Copy link
Member

@rvagg rvagg commented Aug 3, 2022

This has the two commits from #675 but is branched off v1.0.0, the intention with this is to get https://github.com/application-research/filclient updated with v1.0.0 as it's currently relying on cd38741 but I think pulling it to v1.0.0 won't be too traumatic. We'll see, we might have to pull the branch back a bit to not make it too big a jump.

Ref: #673 (comment)

Ideally we can remove go-merkledag entirely from here because most (all?) of
the deal-making infrastructure uses go-codec-dagpb + go-ipld-prime traversals
and post-decode link-reordering is a subtle difference that impacts CAR
ordering for non-spec-compliant DAG-PB blocks.
rvagg added a commit to application-research/filclient that referenced this pull request Aug 3, 2022
Ref: filecoin-project/boost#680

Fixes the CommP mismatch problems with the CAR being generated out of order
for DAGs with certain (slightly) malformed DAG-PB blocks.
@nonsense nonsense changed the base branch from main to release/v1.0.1 August 4, 2022 09:56
@nonsense nonsense changed the title (Do not merge) v1.0.0/filclient-commp-fix branch + patch v1.0.0/filclient-commp-fix branch + patch Aug 4, 2022
@nonsense nonsense marked this pull request as ready for review August 4, 2022 09:57
@nonsense nonsense merged commit be8a3a5 into release/v1.0.1 Aug 4, 2022
@jacobheun
Copy link
Contributor

@nonsense nonsense deleted the v1.0.0/filclient-commp-fix branch October 17, 2022 09:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants