-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Zinnia started -> {Spark,Voyager} started #327
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FWIW, these checks will break after we integrate filecoin-station/zinnia#470
It makes me wonder whether we should make a bigger change in the current design:
WDYT?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Another option: Instead of working with strings, objectify these events into new type:
{ type: activity:start }
That should be enough for this case
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's a great idea to use a new event type 👍🏻
Do you think it should be Zinnia or the module that reports this new event?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure. For consistency it would be better if Zinnia emits it. Otoh it's less semantic, as it only means "I have finished my process startup". If the module does it, it can potentially delay until it has finished all its necessary initialization.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In the future, I'd like one
zinniad
process to run multiple modules. In that future, I can imagine having both events: "module runtime started" and "Spark started"/"Voyager started".For now, I think the simplest option is to add this event to
zinniad
, because then we don't have to expose a new activity API to the JavaScript side.It may be enough to make
print_event()
function publichttps://github.com/filecoin-station/zinnia/blob/d0d12693f565574e2d286b79eb397a6f8f104e3a/daemon/station_reporter.rs#L65-L72
Then change this line to call
print_event()
instead oflog_info_activity()
https://github.com/filecoin-station/zinnia/blob/d0d12693f565574e2d286b79eb397a6f8f104e3a/daemon/main.rs#L59
IIRC, we have two kinds of events - one for the runtime, another for the module(s). Events reported by the runtime come with
module: null
. I would use this mechanism for the start event printed by the runtime.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See filecoin-station/zinnia#475