Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add missing context to watermill messages. #173

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 18, 2022

Conversation

gfyrag
Copy link
Contributor

@gfyrag gfyrag commented Mar 18, 2022

No description provided.

@gfyrag gfyrag requested a review from a team as a code owner March 18, 2022 13:36
@gfyrag gfyrag requested a review from flemzord March 18, 2022 13:36
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 18, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #173 (4b0b4de) into main (b2a6ff4) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Current head 4b0b4de differs from pull request most recent head 384427c. Consider uploading reports for the commit 384427c to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #173      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   74.36%   74.37%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          86       86              
  Lines        3343     3345       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits         2486     2488       +2     
  Misses        679      679              
  Partials      178      178              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pkg/bus/message.go 71.42% <100.00%> (+11.42%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2ff97e1...384427c. Read the comment docs.

@gfyrag gfyrag merged commit 90fd81c into main Mar 18, 2022
@gfyrag gfyrag deleted the feature/add-context-to-watermill-messages branch March 18, 2022 14:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants