Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ReplyBox source name only partially rendered #684

Closed
sssoleileraaa opened this issue Jan 7, 2020 · 6 comments
Closed

ReplyBox source name only partially rendered #684

sssoleileraaa opened this issue Jan 7, 2020 · 6 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@sssoleileraaa
Copy link
Contributor

STR

  1. Open the client without signing in and view a source.
  2. Click login and log in and see source name in reply box appear

Expected

To see the full source name

Action

Only part of the name is painted, see
Screenshot from 2020-01-06 17-16-44

@sssoleileraaa sssoleileraaa added the bug Something isn't working label Jan 7, 2020
@ntoll
Copy link
Contributor

ntoll commented Jan 7, 2020

Question: I'm using the docker image for my local instance of SD. When start the client without signing in I don't see any sources. I've tried creating a new source but can't seem to find a way of viewing a source without first logging in. Suggestions welcome... :-)

(Aside: looking at the screenie, it looks like the widget's paint method isn't getting called properly when the reply box is shown, hence the truncated look).

@redshiftzero
Copy link
Contributor

since the sources are synced from the server, this should also work to repro:

  1. Sign in to client
  2. Wait until all sources are synced
  3. Log out in the client which takes the UI into the offline state

Another path is to start the client using the same sdc_home directory as a previous run where sources were synced (otherwise a new tmpdir is used on each run of run.sh)

@ntoll
Copy link
Contributor

ntoll commented Jan 7, 2020

@redshiftzero OK... I've recreated the problem. Let's see if my hunch is true.

@sssoleileraaa
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @ntoll since youre in this part of the code, just want to throw this on your radar in case you know what's up: #691

@redshiftzero
Copy link
Contributor

should be addressed in #686 (comment if i'm wrong)

@sssoleileraaa
Copy link
Contributor Author

commenting because i'm also no longer seeing this on master branch

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants