Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move site to fd.io/specs/ #322

Closed
4 tasks
rufuspollock opened this issue Nov 17, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed
4 tasks

Move site to fd.io/specs/ #322

rufuspollock opened this issue Nov 17, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@rufuspollock
Copy link
Contributor

Why?

  • Everything in one obvious place

Actions

  • Make sure links use base url style (for jekyll)
  • Move location
  • Implement redirects
  • Apply theme
@rufuspollock
Copy link
Contributor Author

rufuspollock commented Nov 30, 2016

@danfowler any update on this? I think you had planned to have a plan by end of last week.

@danfowler danfowler removed their assignment Dec 6, 2016
@danfowler
Copy link
Contributor

@rgrp I was never and am still not convinced of the value of doing this right now.

@danfowler danfowler added the meta label Dec 6, 2016
@rufuspollock
Copy link
Contributor Author

@danfowler that was true but you agreed in the meeting to assess what it would take and set out pros and cons (at least, as I understood it).

@pwalsh
Copy link
Member

pwalsh commented Dec 18, 2016

After work on #337 to make the specs very DRY, remove ambiguity, etc., it has become clear that generating specs is a very, very different endeavour to putting together a "normal" website, and I'm going to WONTFIX here, and keep the specs site different from the "promotional" site for frictionless data.

@pwalsh pwalsh closed this as completed Dec 18, 2016
@danfowler
Copy link
Contributor

@pwalsh likewise, to remove ambiguity, I think we should remove the in-depth information specs information on frictionlessdata.io with more high-level summaries à la http://frictionlessdata.io/guides/json-table-schema/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants