Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migration to Microsoft.CrmSdk.* assemblies #5

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 25, 2015

Conversation

sergey-tihon
Copy link
Member

Added dependency to official CRM package - Microsoft.CrmSdk.CoreAssemblies

@sergey-tihon
Copy link
Member Author

@pezipink You used only deviceidmanager.cs

The only thing I need right now is good example of assembly binding redirection for TP)

@pezipink
Copy link

pezipink commented Mar 8, 2015

ahh right, once again if memory serves we well I had to bring that in to support CRM Online for some reason...

@sergey-tihon
Copy link
Member Author

I need an advice and good example of assembly binding redirection.
I have tried to reuse implementation from RProvider but it does not work on my machine. AssemblyResolve event is not fired.
Should I create design time assembly? Is it important step?
// @pezipink @mavnn @tpetricek

@pezipink
Copy link

What is the exact scenario here? AssemblyResolve only fires if it cannot resolve the assembly for some reason (not the same as re-direct). I have used it before in type providers including in the IP here

https://github.com/pezipink/InteractiveProvider/blob/master/InteractiveProvider/InteractiveProvider.fs#L13

I am not 100% what you are trying to do though?

@sergey-tihon sergey-tihon changed the title [WIP]Migration to Microsoft.CrmSdk.* assemblies Migration to Microsoft.CrmSdk.* assemblies Mar 25, 2015
sergey-tihon added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2015
Migration to Microsoft.CrmSdk.* assemblies
@sergey-tihon sergey-tihon merged commit 69079f8 into fsprojects:master Mar 25, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants