Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Http links #428

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 5, 2014
Merged

Http links #428

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 5, 2014

Conversation

forki
Copy link
Member

@forki forki commented Dec 5, 2014

The URL of the dependencies file for HTTP links is wrong see https://github.com/fsprojects/Paket/compare/HTTPLinks?expand=1#diff-f49621e896c9b89745f9d4aa9e06cb6fR48

The result is that we currently download the HTTP resource twice. This makes things very slow - as seen in #298

/cc @sergey-tihon

@sergey-tihon
Copy link
Member

Wow @forki !!! You are so fast...

@forki
Copy link
Member Author

forki commented Dec 5, 2014

is that a "ship it"?

@sergey-tihon
Copy link
Member

Yes, it is faster now and download files only once, but it makes very strange calls to the server.
image

@forki
Copy link
Member Author

forki commented Dec 5, 2014

that's actually expected. It tries to locate a (in this case not existing) paket.dependencies file. This allows you to specify further dependencies. see http://fsprojects.github.io/Paket/github-dependencies.html#Remote-dependencies

@sergey-tihon
Copy link
Member

It is a bit strange for me... I thought about something like caching calls during the paket process lifetime... But if it is an expected behavior... no other complaints - "ship it"!

forki added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2014
@forki forki merged commit 152ab87 into master Dec 5, 2014
@forki forki deleted the HTTPLinks branch December 5, 2014 15:18
@forki
Copy link
Member Author

forki commented Dec 5, 2014

released in 0.17.16

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants