Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't add Nuget package twice to ReferencesFile - fixes #454 #460

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2014
Merged

Conversation

forki
Copy link
Member

@forki forki commented Dec 20, 2014

No description provided.

forki added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2014
Don't add Nuget package twice to ReferencesFile - fixes #454
@forki forki merged commit d9dbf4d into master Dec 20, 2014
@forki forki deleted the install branch December 20, 2014 15:05
@@ -20,21 +20,12 @@ let Add(dependenciesFileName, package, version, force, hard, interactive, instal
LockFile.LoadFrom(lockFileName.FullName)

if interactive then
let (PackageName package) = package
let (PackageName packageName) = package
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

packageName is not used in any way, it can be removed.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep I noticed that too.
On Dec 21, 2014 1:26 AM, "Max Malook" notifications@github.com wrote:

In src/Paket.Core/AddProcess.fs
#460 (diff):

@@ -20,21 +20,12 @@ let Add(dependenciesFileName, package, version, force, hard, interactive, instal
LockFile.LoadFrom(lockFileName.FullName)

 if interactive then
  •    let (PackageName package) = package
    
  •    let (PackageName packageName) = package
    

packageName is not used in any way, it can be removed.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/fsprojects/Paket/pull/460/files#r22144892.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants