-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 80
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Restrict flows to Paris and Dublin strategies #1007
Labels
enhancement
New feature or request
Milestone
Comments
fujiapple852
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 12, 2024
Merged
fujiapple852
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 2, 2024
fujiapple852
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 2, 2024
fujiapple852
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 2, 2024
fujiapple852
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 2, 2024
fujiapple852
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 2, 2024
fujiapple852
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 2, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The calculation and display of flows (including
dot
andflows
reports) should be restricted to Paris and Dublin strategies only.Each probe sent in each round is an "independent trail" and may follow a different network path and therefore produce flows which do not exist.
Using the Paris and Dublin tracing strategy all probes within a round are more likely (though not guaranteed) to follow the same path and therefore produce accurate flows. When operating with
FixedSrc
port (default for UDP) orFixedDest
port (default or TCP) for the Paris or Dublin strategy, the variable port is constant for all probes sent within a single round.For example, for UDP (Paris or Dublin) with a fixed src port (5000) and a variable dest port and initial sequence of 33000, the ports used for each probe will be as follows:
As the src and dest port are constant within each round, the path through the network is more likely to be the same for each probe within that round and therefore the flow calculated for the round is more likely to be genuine.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: