Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: try to match port on epic protocol #225

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Oct 13, 2024
Merged

Conversation

cainthebest
Copy link
Member

This follows the same method as node to try and match ports on epic query's.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the protocol This is something regarding a protocol label Oct 11, 2024
@cainthebest
Copy link
Member Author

I have tested via running the query locally a few times and get the same results on the ip stated within issue.

@cainthebest
Copy link
Member Author

This should be good for next patch also

@cainthebest
Copy link
Member Author

Im not to sure on the fallback but it works when there are only partial matches. if there are multiple partial matches the last server in the array index is used as the iter overwrites the value

@cainthebest cainthebest marked this pull request as draft October 11, 2024 13:40
@cainthebest cainthebest marked this pull request as ready for review October 11, 2024 15:22
Copy link
Member

@CosminPerRam CosminPerRam left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good stuff, the previous condition wasn't the same as Node's.

@cainthebest cainthebest merged commit e4baf07 into main Oct 13, 2024
14 checks passed
@cainthebest cainthebest deleted the fix/filter_port_from_epic branch October 13, 2024 19:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
protocol This is something regarding a protocol
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ASA (Ark Survival Ascended): Returns a random server from the cluster (Ignores Port)
2 participants