-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: improve documentation for plugin authors #4272
Changes from 4 commits
ce9b870
c8e65ef
30ad745
3ae8f92
f2c6236
eaa76ae
6d22a0b
7603426
fd6a68c
d5a7118
6a203ea
bab8c3d
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ | ||
--- | ||
title: Plugin Authoring | ||
--- | ||
|
||
Creating custom plugins in Gatsby is a breeze with our straightforward authoring process. | ||
|
||
## Core Concepts | ||
|
||
- Every Gatsby plugin is a standalone npm package | ||
- At minimum, a `package.json` is required | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Remove "At minimum" |
||
- Plugins can be used locally (see [local plugins](#local-plugins) below) or published to npm as packages | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Does this concept conflict with the first concept "Every Gatsby plugin is a standalone npm package"? Maybe the first concept could be something like "A Gatsby plugin is a set of files that can modify Gatsby's behaviour"? |
||
- A plugin has access to the the Gatsby [Node](/docs/node-apis/), [SSR](/docs/ssr-apis/), and [browser](/docs/browser-apis/) APIs | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'd put it "Plugins implement Gatsby APIs for [Node]..." |
||
|
||
## Plugin naming conventions | ||
|
||
There are four standard plugin naming conventions for Gatsby: | ||
|
||
- **`gatsby-source-*`** — a source plugin loads data from a given source (e.g. WordPress, MongoDB, the file system). Use this plugin type if you are connecting a new source of data to Gatsby. | ||
- Example: `gatsby-source-contentful` | ||
- **`gatsby-transformer-*`** — a transformer plugin converts data from one format to another (e.g. CSV to JSON). Use this naming convention | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. "A transformer plugin converts data from one format into JavaScript objects" I can't think of any reason why a transformer plugin wouldn't ever transform data directly into JavaScript objects. It could happen but it's unlikely. |
||
- Example: `gatsby-transformer-yaml` | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Is it possible to add a bit more info on when you'd create a transformer vs a source plugin? Maybe this isn't the right place to write about that, but it's something that's a bit of a grey area to me. |
||
- **`gatsby-[plugin-name]-*`** — if a plugin is a plugin for another plugin 😅, it should be prefixed with the name of the plugin it extends (e.g. if it adds emoji to the output of `gatsby-transformer-remark`, call it `gatsby-remark-add-emoji`). Use this naming convention whenever your plugin will be included as a plugin in the `options` object of another plugin. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'm guessing plugin creators will get this, and possibly I'm just the one who is confused. Because it sounds like if you just keep adding something to the end of all applicable prefixes, wouldn't it be gatsby-transformer-remark-add-emoji? I mean, that's insanely long, but these instructions would have made me think that was correct without the helpful example. Does that make sense? |
||
- Example: `gatsby-remark-images` | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The examples should link to their package page. |
||
- **`gatsby-plugin-*`** — this is the most general plugin type. Use this naming convention if your plugin doesn’t meet the requirements of any other plugin types. | ||
- Example: `gatsby-plugin-sass` | ||
|
||
## What files does Gatsby look for in a plugin? | ||
|
||
- `package.json` — [required] used to find the `name` and `version` fields (both optional) | ||
- this can be an empty object (`{}`) for local plugins | ||
- `gatsby-browser.js` — usage details are in the [browser API reference](/docs/browser-apis/) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Is it worth being explicit that these three files are optional? Similar to the [required] note on |
||
- `gatsby-node.js` — usage details are in the [Node API reference](/docs/node-apis/) | ||
- `gatsby-ssr.js` — usage details are in the [SSR API reference](/docs/ssr-apis/) | ||
|
||
## Local plugins | ||
|
||
When you want to work on a new plugin, or maybe write one that is only relevant | ||
to your specific use-case, a locally defined plugin is more convenient than | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. *because a locally defined |
||
having to create an NPM package for it. | ||
|
||
You can place the code in the `plugins` folder in the root of your project like | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. remove "can" |
||
this: | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. hey hey! Nice use of a full sentence before a colon. I'm not a grammar tight wad (hopefully) but did find it interesting to learn last year that I had been using colons ineffectively for years. They are most effective after full sentences and hardly anyone does that |
||
|
||
``` | ||
plugins | ||
└── my-own-plugin | ||
└── package.json | ||
``` | ||
|
||
**NOTE:** You still need to add the plugin to your `gatsby-config.js` like for plugins | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. like reads a bit strangely to me. Would any of the following work better? the same as, similarly to, as you would, or something else? |
||
installed from NPM. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. *like you would for plugins |
||
|
||
At a minimum, each plugin requires a package.json file, but the minimum content is just an | ||
empty object `{}`. The `name` and `version` fields are read from the package | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The first sentence mentions that "the minimum content is just an empty object". The following sentence then explains what is read from package.json. I find this a little confusing—first it's "okay to be empty", but then "things are read" only fully makes sense to me after advancing to the following paragraphs. I think an addition to the second sentence would help (me ;-)), but I'm not sure if the following is the best way to go:
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Good point — let me add what the default values are. |
||
file. The name is used to identify the plugin when it mutates the GraphQL data | ||
structure. The version is used to clear the cache when it changes. | ||
|
||
For local plugins it is best to leave the version field empty. Gatsby will | ||
generate an md5-hash from all `gatsby-*` file contents and use that as the | ||
version. This way the cache is automatically flushed when you change the code of | ||
your plugin. | ||
|
||
If the name is empty it is inferred from the plugin folder name. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. *empty, |
||
|
||
Like all `gatsby-*` files, the code is not being processed by Babel. If you want | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. *is not processed Kill "being" |
||
to use JavaScript syntax which isn't supported by your version of Node.js, you | ||
can place the files in a `src` subfolder and build them to the plugin folder | ||
root. |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -40,41 +40,9 @@ Plugins can take options. Note that plugin options will be stringified by Gatsby | |
See each plugin page below for more detailed | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. just for less redundancy, perhaps: "see the links below for instructions on how to use each plugin" |
||
documentation on using each plugin. | ||
|
||
## Locally defined plugins | ||
## Creating your own plugins | ||
|
||
When you want to work on a new plugin, or maybe write one that is only relevant | ||
to your specific use-case, a locally defined plugin is more convenient than | ||
having to create an NPM package for it. | ||
|
||
You can place the code in the `plugins` folder in the root of your project like | ||
this: | ||
|
||
``` | ||
plugins | ||
└── my-own-plugin | ||
├── gatsby-node.js | ||
└── package.json | ||
``` | ||
|
||
You still need to add the plugin to your `gatsby-config.js` like for plugins | ||
installed from NPM. | ||
|
||
Each plugin requires a package.json file, but the minimum content is just an | ||
empty object `{}`. The `name` and `version` fields are read from the package | ||
file. The name is used to identify the plugin when it mutates the GraphQL data | ||
structure. The version is used to clear the cache when it changes. | ||
|
||
For local plugins it is best to leave the version field empty. Gatsby will | ||
generate an md5-hash from all gatsby-\* file contents and use that as the | ||
version. This way the cache is automatically flushed when you change the code of | ||
your plugin. | ||
|
||
If the name is empty it is inferred from the plugin folder name. | ||
|
||
Like all gatsby-\* files, the code is not being processed by Babel. If you want | ||
to use JavaScript syntax which isn't supported by your version of Node.js, you | ||
can place the files in a `src` subfolder and build them to the plugin folder | ||
root. | ||
If you’d like to create a custom Gatsby plugin, check out the [plugin authoring guide](/docs/plugin-authoring/). | ||
|
||
## Official plugins | ||
|
||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We've been following @robwierzbowski's suggestion to avoid indicating something is "easy" as that can intimidate newer developers for whom everything is complicated
#3159
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed. Another way to word this could be:
I don't know if that is gobbledygook language since I'm not a programmer. The essence would be to emphasize how Gatsby is meant to be open to plugins. It was built to expect them. Or something like that. Just a tone that invites people to experiment and realize that there is a lot of potential for an awesome plugin ecosystem.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey, thanks for remembering! My two cents:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good call. I'm leaning toward @robwierzbowski's wording, and I'll work in some examples of good candidates for plugins.