Header guard fix for battery power load component

[marcoag]

Signed-off-by: Marco A. Gutierrez marco@openrobotics.org

🦟 Bug fix

Related to #1811.

Summary

Fix to the header guard for the battery power load component where the #ifndef was not matching the following #define.

Checklist

• Signed all commits for DCO
• Added tests
• Updated documentation (as needed)
• Updated migration guide (as needed)
• Consider updating Python bindings (if the library has them)
• codecheck passed (See contributing)
• All tests passed (See test coverage)
• While waiting for a review on your PR, please help review another open pull request to support the maintainers

Note to maintainers: Remember to use Squash-Merge and edit the commit message to match the pull request summary while retaining Signed-off-by messages.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1846 (58da7f0) into ign-gazebo6 (10ed22b) will decrease coverage by 0.04%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 58da7f0 differs from pull request most recent head b94683b. Consider uploading reports for the commit b94683b to get more accurate results

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##           ign-gazebo6    #1846      +/-   ##
===============================================
- Coverage        64.80%   64.75%   -0.05%     
===============================================
  Files              322      322              
  Lines            26389    26389              
===============================================
- Hits             17102    17089      -13     
- Misses            9287     9300      +13     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...ude/ignition/gazebo/components/BatteryPowerLoad.hh	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/SimulationRunner.cc	89.87% <0.00%> (-1.90%)	⬇️
src/EntityComponentManager.cc	89.38% <0.00%> (-0.13%)	⬇️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

[azeey]

I don't know how a PR that fixes a header guard could change overage at all. I wonder if our coverage tool isn't working properly.

[marcoag]

It seems like the code in this component could have not been taken into account...