Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ISSUE-16 - Remove no longer needed mapping functions: #154

Conversation

jmcconnell26
Copy link
Contributor

  • Moving functions which are still required to test parity to code only
    compiled in tests
  • Adding a fix for edge case stumbled upon by mistake, where
    dependencies can be duplicated
  • Removing explicit use of cargo_metadata::PackageId outside of
    mapping module

Signed-off-by: joshmc josh-mcc@tiscali.co.uk

* Moving functions which are still required to test parity to code only
  compiled in tests
* Adding a fix for edge case stumbled upon by mistake, where
  dependencies can be duplicated
* Removing explicit use of `cargo_metadata::PackageId` outside of
  `mapping` module

Signed-off-by: joshmc <josh-mcc@tiscali.co.uk>
@jmcconnell26
Copy link
Contributor Author

This PR should take us past the line on #16 finally!
I've left the use of cargo core in the unit tests for the mapping module for testing parity.
If there's anything else covered in the scope of the issue please let me know!
Thanks,
Josh

@anderejd
Copy link
Contributor

Seriously great work on #16! 🥇

@anderejd anderejd merged commit 31e66fa into geiger-rs:master Nov 30, 2020
jmcconnell26 pushed a commit to jmcconnell26/cargo-geiger that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2020
…ongerNeededMappingFunctions

ISSUE-16 - Remove no longer needed mapping functions:

Signed-off-by: joshmc <josh-mcc@tiscali.co.uk>
jmcconnell26 pushed a commit to jmcconnell26/cargo-geiger that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2020
…ongerNeededMappingFunctions

ISSUE-16 - Remove no longer needed mapping functions:

Signed-off-by: joshmc <josh-mcc@tiscali.co.uk>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants