Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

STAC API refactor #897

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 30, 2023
Merged

STAC API refactor #897

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 30, 2023

Conversation

tomkralidis
Copy link
Member

@tomkralidis tomkralidis commented Sep 16, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Overview

This PR refactors STAC API support into its own codepath.

String interpolation is also migrated to f-strings.

Related Issue / Discussion

None

Additional Information

None

Contributions and Licensing

(as per https://github.com/geopython/pycsw/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.rst#contributions-and-licensing)

  • I'd like to contribute [feature X|bugfix Y|docs|something else] to pycsw. I confirm that my contributions to pycsw will be compatible with the pycsw license guidelines at the time of contribution.
  • I have already previously agreed to the pycsw Contributions and Licensing Guidelines

@tomkralidis tomkralidis force-pushed the stac-refactor branch 3 times, most recently from 130b2a8 to c2021a1 Compare September 24, 2023 13:01
@tomkralidis tomkralidis changed the title [WIP] STAC API refactor STAC API refactor Sep 24, 2023
@kalxas kalxas self-requested a review September 24, 2023 20:18
@kalxas kalxas self-assigned this Sep 24, 2023
@kalxas kalxas force-pushed the stac-refactor branch 2 times, most recently from d88c9c0 to 24a0efb Compare September 30, 2023 12:08
@kalxas kalxas merged commit e1abe9b into master Sep 30, 2023
4 checks passed
@kalxas kalxas deleted the stac-refactor branch September 30, 2023 16:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@kalxas kalxas kalxas approved these changes

Assignees

@kalxas kalxas

Labels
enhancement server
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@tomkralidis @kalxas