Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Run search
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history 
Command
   colrev search
   On commit 6bec2a8

Status
    init 
    retrieve         31 retrieved     [13 quality-curated]
    prescreen        31 included      
    pdfs             31 retrieved     
    screen           31 included      
    data             31 synthesized   [completed] 

Properties
    Traceability of records        YES
    Consistency (based on hooks)   YES
    Completeness of iteration      YES
    To check tree_hash use         git log --pretty=raw -1
    To validate use                colrev validate f44deeb662a3f30073f8acc5bf414686fd127532 --properties

Software
    colrev                         version 0.9.2
    Python                         version 3.10.6
    Git                            version 2.41.0
    Docker                         version 23.0.6+azure-2, build ef23cbc4315ae76c744e02d687c09548ede461bd

Processing report
  • Loading branch information
@geritwagner
script:colrev search authored and geritwagner committed Aug 12, 2023
1 parent 6bec2a8 commit 5de92fd
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 11 additions and 3 deletions.
10 changes: 7 additions & 3 deletions data/records.bib
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -170,14 +170,15 @@ @article{MorquinOlogeanuTaddeiPareEtAl2023
title:pdfs.bib/000011;;
year:pdfs.bib/000011;;
author:pdfs.bib/000011;;
volume:md_crossref.bib/000004;not-missing;
number:md_crossref.bib/000004;not-missing;
volume:md_crossref.bib/000004;;
number:md_crossref.bib/000004;;
pages:original|manual_correction;;},
colrev_data_provenance = {file:pdfs.bib/000011;;
doi:pdfs.bib/000011;;
language:md_crossref.bib/000004;;
fulltext:md_crossref.bib/000004;;
cited_by:md_crossref.bib/000004;;},
cited_by:md_crossref.bib/000004;;
abstract:md_crossref.bib/000004;;},
colrev_pdf_id = {cpid2:ffffffe0e0ffffffffffffd7e23ffffffbf7e6dfe000001fe000003fe003ffffffffffffc0c09c7ffffffffffff8ffffeff80007fff80007e3f80007e2f80007fff80007fff80007fff80007fff80007fff80007fff80007fff80007fff80007fff80007fff80007fff80007fff80007fff80007fff80007fff0380fffffffff},
screening_criteria = {NA},
file = {data/pdfs/MorquinOlogeanuTaddeiPareEtAl2023.pdf},
Expand All @@ -186,7 +187,10 @@ @article{MorquinOlogeanuTaddeiPareEtAl2023
journal = {Information Systems Journal},
title = {A method for resolving organisation-enterprise system misfits: An action research study in a pluralistic organisation},
year = {2023},
volume = {33},
number = {5},
pages = {1--34},
abstract = {Although off‐the‐shelf enterprise systems (ES) have been widely adopted in organisations, the extant literature repeatedly documents ES failures caused by misfits between organisational processes and the ES. Although some misfits can be identified early in the ES lifecycle, others emerge in the onward and upward phase (i.e., after the implementation) and, hence, must be resolved reactively. Prior research on misfits and resolution strategies has primarily focused on the implementation phase, often assuming that close‐to‐perfect information on the misfit's nature and characteristics is available. However, no study has examined how to effectively complete a shared diagnosis and resolution of misfits when diverging individual user perceptions are taken as the starting point. Such situations may be particularly pronounced in pluralistic organisations, where a variety of interdependent processes and potentially competing perceptions of processes are prevalent. The main objective of this study is to address this gap. To this end, we propose a pragmatic method for the diagnosis and resolution of misfits between organisational processes and enterprise systems, which builds on an actionable conceptualization of misfits. This method builds on theoretical concepts of affordances, affordance actualization, user participation, and change agentry. To demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method, we conducted an action research study in a university hospital. Our analysis focused on a specific misfit involving the hospital's ES‐supported clinical processes. The findings suggest that the method effectively diagnoses and resolves misfits and optimises the resources required for their resolution through efficient management of user participation. We conclude with a discussion of the theoretical and practical contributions of our work.},
cited_by = {0},
fulltext = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/isj.12433},
language = {eng},
Expand Down
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions data/search/md_crossref.bib
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -43,6 +43,10 @@ @article{000004
journal = {Information Systems Journal},
title = {A method for resolving organisation‐enterprise system misfits: An action research study in a pluralistic organisation},
year = {2023},
volume = {33},
number = {5},
pages = {995--1028},
abstract = {Although off‐the‐shelf enterprise systems (ES) have been widely adopted in organisations, the extant literature repeatedly documents ES failures caused by misfits between organisational processes and the ES. Although some misfits can be identified early in the ES lifecycle, others emerge in the onward and upward phase (i.e., after the implementation) and, hence, must be resolved reactively. Prior research on misfits and resolution strategies has primarily focused on the implementation phase, often assuming that close‐to‐perfect information on the misfit's nature and characteristics is available. However, no study has examined how to effectively complete a shared diagnosis and resolution of misfits when diverging individual user perceptions are taken as the starting point. Such situations may be particularly pronounced in pluralistic organisations, where a variety of interdependent processes and potentially competing perceptions of processes are prevalent. The main objective of this study is to address this gap. To this end, we propose a pragmatic method for the diagnosis and resolution of misfits between organisational processes and enterprise systems, which builds on an actionable conceptualization of misfits. This method builds on theoretical concepts of affordances, affordance actualization, user participation, and change agentry. To demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method, we conducted an action research study in a university hospital. Our analysis focused on a specific misfit involving the hospital's ES‐supported clinical processes. The findings suggest that the method effectively diagnoses and resolves misfits and optimises the resources required for their resolution through efficient management of user participation. We conclude with a discussion of the theoretical and practical contributions of our work.},
cited_by = {0},
fulltext = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/isj.12433},
language = {eng},
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 5de92fd

Please sign in to comment.