Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refresh cache ref #131 #136

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Refresh cache ref #131 #136

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

chainsawriot
Copy link
Collaborator

@chainsawriot chainsawriot commented Apr 17, 2023

Merge this only when #134 is merged and modifications about refreshing to the apptainer functions are added.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #136 (085cc72) into v0.3 (ac0843b) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

📣 This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             v0.3     #136   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.29%   97.30%           
=======================================
  Files          10       10           
  Lines         999     1001    +2     
=======================================
+ Hits          972      974    +2     
  Misses         27       27           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
R/use_rang.R 100.00% <ø> (ø)
R/installation.R 97.44% <100.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@chainsawriot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Keep it here. But I think I might not merge this because I need to refactor dockerize and apptainerize first.

@chainsawriot chainsawriot deleted the refresh branch October 8, 2023 10:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants