Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add webln provider config #172

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 5, 2024
Merged

Conversation

rolznz
Copy link
Collaborator

@rolznz rolznz commented Dec 28, 2023

No description provided.

@rolznz rolznz requested review from bumi and reneaaron December 28, 2023 14:17
Copy link

Updated dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Packages Version New capabilities Transitives Size Publisher
@getalby/sdk 3.2.2...3.2.3 None +0/-0 131 kB

await nwc.initNWC({
...(providerConfig?.nwc?.authorizationUrlOptions || {}),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

does this mean we need to define all the potential provider config options here in BC?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no, they're all optional and it just defaults to an empty object

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
import {types} from '@getalby/sdk';

export type WebLNProviderConfig = {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can this be generic?
These are options that a developer passes to an underlaying library. why does BC need to know about the potential options?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it can to some extent, but we still need to know how to pass it - for example the NWC one if very specific right now (I don't know to do it generically yet, maybe we wait for a usecase?)

@rolznz
Copy link
Collaborator Author

rolznz commented Dec 28, 2023

@bumi maybe what request methods could be used could eventually be passed to webln somehow. Like in webln.enable (but that'd need some big changes)

@rolznz rolznz merged commit ed30735 into master Jan 5, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants