Hubs/Scopes Merge 12 - Replace IHub with IScopes in Spring 6 / Spring Boot 3 integrations

[adinauer]

#skip-changelog

📜 Description

Follow up for #3297 changing Spring 6 / Spring Boot 3 integrations.

💡 Motivation and Context

💚 How did you test it?

📝 Checklist

• I reviewed the submitted code.
• I added tests to verify the changes.
• No new PII added or SDK only sends newly added PII if sendDefaultPII is enabled.
• I updated the docs if needed.
• Review from the native team if needed.
• No breaking change or entry added to the changelog.
• No breaking change for hybrid SDKs or communicated to hybrid SDKs.

🔮 Next steps

[github-actions]

	Messages
📖	Do not forget to update Sentry-docs with your feature once the pull request gets approved.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 86ac8bc

[github-actions]

Performance metrics 🚀

	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
Startup time	439.45 ms	521.61 ms	82.17 ms
Size	1.70 MiB	2.28 MiB	592.27 KiB

Previous results on branch: feat/hsm-12-replacements-in-spring-6-boot-3-integrations

Startup times

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
4b65fe9	419.57 ms	487.65 ms	68.07 ms

App size

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
4b65fe9	1.70 MiB	2.28 MiB	592.27 KiB

[lbloder]

Comment on class Reactive in SentryProperties should refer to scopes.
Should we rename HubConfiguration in SentryAutoConfiguration?
Comment on class EnableSentry refer to Hub instead of Scopes.

Also, should we rename the SentryHubRegistrar and its methods?

[lbloder]

Should we rename HubConfiguration in SentryAutoConfiguration?

[lbloder]

Should we rename this method?

[markushi]

Should this be renamed to SentryScopesRegistrar?

[adinauer]

We need to test whether renaming Spring beans and config classes breaks anything. Even then user code could break by renaming them.