-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Streamline sentry-trace
, baggage
and DSC handling
#14364
Conversation
}; | ||
|
||
const trace = evt.contexts && evt.contexts.trace; | ||
if (!trace && propagationContext) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These checks were not really necessary, I believe - first, propagationContext
cannot be empty here. And second, we do not need to check for trace
as this will be overwritten anyhow by ...evt.contexts
if it already exists.
}; | ||
|
||
const sentryTraceHeader = | ||
span && hasTracingEnabled() ? spanToTraceHeader(span) : generateSentryTraceHeader(traceId, spanId, sampled); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here, we have checked for span && hasTracingEnabled()
, while in fetch we did not check for hasTracingEnabled()
. I opted to use this logic (just check span) everywhere now...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For browser, I think that's fine!
size-limit report 📦
|
63ab398
to
0d74e78
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maybe I'm missing something obvious but why do we need getSentryHeaders
? Doesn't getTraceData
already do this? I'd prefer we avoid adding another utility function if we don't strictly have to do it.
Hmm, you are right that these are kind of similar 🤔 but |
a376535
to
1608c4c
Compare
packages/core/src/fetch.ts
Outdated
request, | ||
client, | ||
scope, | ||
undefined, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
these just remain for backwards compatibility, because addTracingHeadersToFetchRequest
is exported :/
client.init(); | ||
|
||
return client; | ||
} | ||
|
||
describe('getTraceData', () => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
these tests relied a lot on mocks, and since the underlying implementation was changed a bunch of this broke. So I rewrote these tests to use "real" stuff as much as possible, but tried to keep the scenarios we want to cover intact.
❌ 15 Tests Failed:
View the top 3 failed tests by shortest run time
To view more test analytics, go to the Test Analytics Dashboard |
@lforst & @Lms24 OK, Now for real I think it should work. I had to change the custom |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is a good refactor! A bit concerned that bundle size is increasing although it looks like we removed more code than we added 😅
}; | ||
|
||
const sentryTraceHeader = | ||
span && hasTracingEnabled() ? spanToTraceHeader(span) : generateSentryTraceHeader(traceId, spanId, sampled); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For browser, I think that's fine!
yeah this is really weird 😬 not really sure where this is coming from... I think I'd still do this and hope that some follow up refactoring can safe a few bytes there. Sometimes, the ways of bundle size are not easy to understand 😬 |
sentry-trace
, baggage
and DSC handlingsentry-trace
, baggage
and DSC handling
@Lms24 so, after digging some more into why this increases bundle size, I believe it is because of this code in const isValidSentryTraceHeader = TRACEPARENT_REGEXP.test(sentryTrace);
if (!isValidSentryTraceHeader) {
logger.warn('Invalid sentry-trace data. Cannot generate trace data');
return {};
}
const validBaggage = isValidBaggageString(baggage);
if (!validBaggage) {
logger.warn('Invalid baggage data. Not returning "baggage" value');
} which basically checks some regexes. We have not checked this before, so now we have to include these regexes in the browser bundles which increases bundle size 😬 So IMHO either we accept this, or we only check these things in debug mode (?). I am not aware of any problems we had with this so far in browser land where we did not use to check this, so I am missing context for why we are checking this so defensively here. |
Honestly checking for validity of shapes is a bit weird. Our parsing/writing logic should just have sensible defaults and there is no need to be so defensive. Can we remove this checking logic? |
I think it's fine to remove the validation logic! For the record: We introduced the baggage validation logic because of XSS concerns (#9483 (comment)), originally in the Astro SDK. The Astro SDK code was later extracted to the core SDK for I'm not sure though how valid the potential vector here is so chances are we were over-cautious back then. |
I will merge this as is for now, and we can look into the validation in a follow up PR 👍 |
This PR contains the following updates: | Package | Type | Update | Change | |---|---|---|---| | [@sentry/node](https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-javascript/tree/master/packages/node) ([source](https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-javascript)) | dependencies | minor | [`8.40.0` -> `8.42.0`](https://renovatebot.com/diffs/npm/@sentry%2fnode/8.40.0/8.42.0) | | [@sentry/react](https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-javascript/tree/master/packages/react) ([source](https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-javascript)) | dependencies | minor | [`8.40.0` -> `8.42.0`](https://renovatebot.com/diffs/npm/@sentry%2freact/8.40.0/8.42.0) | --- ### Release Notes <details> <summary>getsentry/sentry-javascript (@​sentry/node)</summary> ### [`v8.42.0`](https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-javascript/blob/HEAD/CHANGELOG.md#8420) [Compare Source](getsentry/sentry-javascript@8.41.0...8.42.0) ##### Important Changes - **feat(react): React Router v7 support (library) ([#​14513](getsentry/sentry-javascript#14513 This release adds support for [React Router v7 (library mode)](https://reactrouter.com/home#react-router-as-a-library). Check out the docs on how to set up the integration: [Sentry React Router v7 Integration Docs](https://docs.sentry.io/platforms/javascript/guides/react/features/react-router/v7/) ##### Deprecations - **feat: Warn about source-map generation ([#​14533](getsentry/sentry-javascript#14533 In the next major version of the SDK we will change how source maps are generated when the SDK is added to an application. Currently, the implementation varies a lot between different SDKs and can be difficult to understand. Moving forward, our goal is to turn on source maps for every framework, unless we detect that they are explicitly turned off. Additionally, if we end up enabling source maps, we will emit a log message that we did so. With this particular release, we are emitting warnings that source map generation will change in the future and we print instructions on how to prepare for the next major. - **feat(nuxt): Deprecate `tracingOptions` in favor of `vueIntegration` ([#​14530](getsentry/sentry-javascript#14530 Currently it is possible to configure tracing options in two places in the Sentry Nuxt SDK: - In `Sentry.init()` - Inside `tracingOptions` in `Sentry.init()` For tree-shaking purposes and alignment with the Vue SDK, it is now recommended to instead use the newly exported `vueIntegration()` and its `tracingOptions` option to configure tracing options in the Nuxt SDK: ```ts // sentry.client.config.ts import * as Sentry from '@​sentry/nuxt'; Sentry.init({ // ... integrations: [ Sentry.vueIntegration({ tracingOptions: { trackComponents: true, }, }), ], }); ``` ##### Other Changes - feat(browser-utils): Update `web-vitals` to v4.2.4 ([#​14439](getsentry/sentry-javascript#14439)) - feat(nuxt): Expose `vueIntegration` ([#​14526](getsentry/sentry-javascript#14526)) - fix(feedback): Handle css correctly in screenshot mode ([#​14535](getsentry/sentry-javascript#14535)) ### [`v8.41.0`](https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-javascript/blob/HEAD/CHANGELOG.md#8410) [Compare Source](getsentry/sentry-javascript@8.40.0...8.41.0) ##### Important Changes - **meta(nuxt): Require minimum Nuxt v3.7.0 ([#​14473](getsentry/sentry-javascript#14473 We formalized that the Nuxt SDK is at minimum compatible with Nuxt version 3.7.0 and above. Additionally, the SDK requires the implicit `nitropack` dependency to satisfy version `^2.10.0` and `ofetch` to satisfy `^1.4.0`. It is recommended to check your lock-files and manually upgrade these dependencies if they don't match the version ranges. ##### Deprecations We are deprecating a few APIs which will be removed in the next major. The following deprecations will *potentially* affect you: - **feat(core): Update & deprecate `undefined` option handling ([#​14450](getsentry/sentry-javascript#14450 In the next major version we will change how passing `undefined` to `tracesSampleRate` / `tracesSampler` / `enableTracing` will behave. Currently, doing the following: ```ts Sentry.init({ tracesSampleRate: undefined, }); ``` Will result in tracing being *enabled* (although no spans will be generated) because the `tracesSampleRate` key is present in the options object. In the next major version, this behavior will be changed so that passing `undefined` (or rather having a `tracesSampleRate` key) will result in tracing being disabled, the same as not passing the option at all. If you are currently relying on `undefined` being passed, and and thus have tracing enabled, it is recommended to update your config to set e.g. `tracesSampleRate: 0` instead, which will also enable tracing in v9. The same applies to `tracesSampler` and `enableTracing`. - **feat(core): Log warnings when returning `null` in `beforeSendSpan` ([#​14433](getsentry/sentry-javascript#14433 Currently, the `beforeSendSpan` option in `Sentry.init()` allows you to drop individual spans from a trace by returning `null` from the hook. Since this API lends itself to creating "gaps" inside traces, we decided to change how this API will work in the next major version. With the next major version the `beforeSendSpan` API can only be used to mutate spans, but no longer to drop them. With this release the SDK will warn you if you are using this API to drop spans. Instead, it is recommended to configure instrumentation (i.e. integrations) directly to control what spans are created. Additionally, with the next major version, root spans will also be passed to `beforeSendSpan`. - **feat(utils): Deprecate `@sentry/utils` ([#​14431](getsentry/sentry-javascript#14431 With the next major version the `@sentry/utils` package will be merged into the `@sentry/core` package. It is therefore no longer recommended to use the `@sentry/utils` package. - **feat(vue): Deprecate configuring Vue tracing options anywhere else other than through the `vueIntegration`'s `tracingOptions` option ([#​14385](getsentry/sentry-javascript#14385 Currently it is possible to configure tracing options in various places in the Sentry Vue SDK: - In `Sentry.init()` - Inside `tracingOptions` in `Sentry.init()` - In the `vueIntegration()` options - Inside `tracingOptions` in the `vueIntegration()` options Because this is a bit messy and confusing to document, the only recommended way to configure tracing options going forward is through the `tracingOptions` in the `vueIntegration()`. The other means of configuration will be removed in the next major version of the SDK. - **feat: Deprecate `registerEsmLoaderHooks.include` and `registerEsmLoaderHooks.exclude` ([#​14486](getsentry/sentry-javascript#14486 Currently it is possible to define `registerEsmLoaderHooks.include` and `registerEsmLoaderHooks.exclude` options in `Sentry.init()` to only apply ESM loader hooks to a subset of modules. This API served as an escape hatch in case certain modules are incompatible with ESM loader hooks. Since this API was introduced, a way was found to only wrap modules that there exists instrumentation for (meaning a vetted list). To only wrap modules that have instrumentation, it is recommended to instead set `registerEsmLoaderHooks.onlyIncludeInstrumentedModules` to `true`. Note that `onlyIncludeInstrumentedModules: true` will become the default behavior in the next major version and the `registerEsmLoaderHooks` will no longer accept fine-grained options. The following deprecations will *most likely* not affect you unless you are building an SDK yourself: - feat(core): Deprecate `arrayify` ([#​14405](getsentry/sentry-javascript#14405)) - feat(core): Deprecate `flatten` ([#​14454](getsentry/sentry-javascript#14454)) - feat(core): Deprecate `urlEncode` ([#​14406](getsentry/sentry-javascript#14406)) - feat(core): Deprecate `validSeverityLevels` ([#​14407](getsentry/sentry-javascript#14407)) - feat(core/utils): Deprecate `getNumberOfUrlSegments` ([#​14458](getsentry/sentry-javascript#14458)) - feat(utils): Deprecate `memoBuilder`, `BAGGAGE_HEADER_NAME`, and `makeFifoCache` ([#​14434](getsentry/sentry-javascript#14434)) - feat(utils/core): Deprecate `addRequestDataToEvent` and `extractRequestData` ([#​14430](getsentry/sentry-javascript#14430)) ##### Other Changes - feat: Streamline `sentry-trace`, `baggage` and DSC handling ([#​14364](getsentry/sentry-javascript#14364)) - feat(core): Further optimize debug ID parsing ([#​14365](getsentry/sentry-javascript#14365)) - feat(node): Add `openTelemetryInstrumentations` option ([#​14484](getsentry/sentry-javascript#14484)) - feat(nuxt): Add filter for not found source maps (devtools) ([#​14437](getsentry/sentry-javascript#14437)) - feat(nuxt): Only delete public source maps ([#​14438](getsentry/sentry-javascript#14438)) - fix(nextjs): Don't report `NEXT_REDIRECT` from browser ([#​14440](getsentry/sentry-javascript#14440)) - perf(opentelemetry): Bucket spans for cleanup ([#​14154](getsentry/sentry-javascript#14154)) Work in this release was contributed by [@​NEKOYASAN](https://github.com/NEKOYASAN) and [@​fmorett](https://github.com/fmorett). Thank you for your contributions! </details> --- ### Configuration 📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined). 🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied. ♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox. 🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again. --- - [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box --- This PR has been generated by [Renovate Bot](https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate). <!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiIzOC4xNDIuNyIsInVwZGF0ZWRJblZlciI6IjM4LjE0Mi43IiwidGFyZ2V0QnJhbmNoIjoibWFpbiIsImxhYmVscyI6WyJkZXBlbmRlbmNpZXMiXX0=--> Reviewed-on: https://git.tristess.app/alexandresoro/ouca/pulls/374 Reviewed-by: Alexandre Soro <code@soro.dev> Co-authored-by: renovate <renovate@git.tristess.app> Co-committed-by: renovate <renovate@git.tristess.app>
As a first step for #12385, I looked though our current implementations, and tried to streamline this. We have a bunch of somewhat duplicate code there that handles sentry-trace & baggage headers mostly the same but not fully the same, as well as relatedly the DSC.
To streamline this, I added some new methods in core:
getTraceData
already exists, but was extended to also allow to pass a specificspan
to it. I updated some code to use this method that hasn't used it before, and also added some more tests - also around the ACS and the otel-specific implementation for this.getDynamicSamplingContextFromScope
andgetTraceContextFromScope
which handle picking these things from given scope etc.While working on this, I also noticed that
captureCheckIn
in ServerRuntimeClient was actually not properly working in Node (OTEL), as it relied on the core way of scope-span coupling. So I also updated this to actually work as expected.