Sass is an actual language #2585
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Hi @hcatlin. We've been going back and forth a little on what to do with the grouping functionality in Linguist as I think there are some UI concerns when looking at a repository that contains languages defined as part of a larger group (see similar discussion here for I'd like us to fix the UI issue on GitHub rather than removing the grouping functionality so I'm going to close this. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I'd like to request that Sass/SCSS both be removed from the CSS group and have it's own group created. Sass has a ton of usage these days, outranking a lot of the other 'top level' languages, and while it's a server-side preprocessor, both of it's syntaxes are full blown languages at this point and think they deserve differentiation from their W3C brethren.
Thanks!