Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

hidden: false for 'popular' licenses #456

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 26, 2016
Merged

Conversation

mlinksva
Copy link
Contributor

  • document criteria for whether a license is hidden
  • adjust license properties and tests accordingly

This gets non-hidden list back close to what it was before #386 and (pending licensee vendoring this change, licensee release, and github.com licensee dependency version bump) some commonly requested licenses (eg #413 #449) will reappear in the github.com license drop-down.

cc @arfon

- document criteria for whether a license is hidden
  - needed for license spectrum on /licenses OR
  - on 'popular' list at https://opensource.org/licenses (some other list could be used in the future)
- adjust license properties and tests accordingly

This gets non-hidden list back close to what it was before #386 and (pending licensee vendoring this change, licensee release, and github.com licensee dependency version bump) some commonly requested licenses (eg #413 #449) will reappear in the github.com license drop-down.
Copy link

@arfon arfon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me.

@waldyrious
Copy link
Contributor

Potential additional lists to use are github-specific statistics like this (maybe that very list could be used for now, since the proportions aren't likely to change too dramatically over time), and cross-host stats like this (maybe just the top 10).

Any thoughts about these?

@mlinksva
Copy link
Contributor Author

@waldyrious yes those sorts of stats, though I'd prefer ones that are based on public datasets; GitHub-specific ones could be obtained from the GitHub datasets in Google BigQuery, see https://github.com/blog/2201-making-open-source-data-more-available

@mlinksva mlinksva merged commit 08d8173 into gh-pages Sep 26, 2016
@mlinksva mlinksva deleted the unhidden-criteria branch September 26, 2016 20:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants