Add missing space to security-hardening-for-github-actions.md

content/actions/security-for-github-actions/security-guides/security-hardening-for-github-actions.md

@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@
     * {% data variables.product.prodname_github_apps %} can be installed on select repositories, and even have granular permissions on the resources within them. You could create a {% data variables.product.prodname_github_app %} internal to your organization, install it on the repositories you need access to within your workflow, and authenticate as the installation within your workflow to access those repositories. For more information, see [AUTOTITLE](/apps/creating-github-apps/guides/making-authenticated-api-requests-with-a-github-app-in-a-github-actions-workflow).
 1. **{% data variables.product.pat_generic %}s**
     * You should never use a {% data variables.product.pat_v1 %}. These tokens grant access to all repositories within the organizations that you have access to, as well as all personal repositories in your personal account. This indirectly grants broad access to all write-access users of the repository the workflow is in.
-    * If you do use a {% data variables.product.pat_generic %}, you should never use a {% data variables.product.pat_generic %} from your own account. If you later leave an organization, workflows using this token will immediately break, and debugging this issue can be challenging. Instead, you should use a {% data variables.product.pat_v2 %}for a new account that belongs to your organization and that is only granted access to the specific repositories that are needed for the workflow. Note that this approach is not scalable and should be avoided in favor of alternatives, such as deploy keys.
+    * If you do use a {% data variables.product.pat_generic %}, you should never use a {% data variables.product.pat_generic %} from your own account. If you later leave an organization, workflows using this token will immediately break, and debugging this issue can be challenging. Instead, you should use a {% data variables.product.pat_v2 %} for a new account that belongs to your organization and that is only granted access to the specific repositories that are needed for the workflow. Note that this approach is not scalable and should be avoided in favor of alternatives, such as deploy keys.
 1. **SSH keys on a personal account**
     * Workflows should never use the SSH keys on a personal account. Similar to {% data variables.product.pat_v1_plural %}, they grant read/write permissions to all of your personal repositories as well as all the repositories you have access to through organization membership. This indirectly grants broad access to all write-access users of the repository the workflow is in. If you're intending to use an SSH key because you only need to perform repository clones or pushes, and do not need to interact with public APIs, then you should use individual deploy keys instead.
 
@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@
 
 Some customers might attempt to partially mitigate these risks by implementing systems that automatically destroy the self-hosted runner after each job execution. However, this approach might not be as effective as intended, as there is no way to guarantee that a self-hosted runner only runs one job. Some jobs will use secrets as command-line arguments which can be seen by another job running on the same runner, such as `ps x -w`. This can lead to secret leakages.
 
 {% ifversion actions-single-use-tokens %}
 
 ### Using just-in-time runners