feat: add unarchiving plugin #692
Open
+189
−30
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The unit test is rudimentary. Running locally for many cycles has not caused issues, but more tests or review would be appreciated. |
|
👍 this would be super useful for me |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Meant to resolve #443 may help #559
Inspired by #193 I've added a one-off plugin. It is called archive. In most cases it does nothing, but in case a config for archiving a repo is true and the real repo is not archived this plugin will archive that repo and prevent other plugins from running. This does mean config may not be provided to an archived repo, but since it's being archived that hardly matters. This will also clobber the diff comment for PRs where archived is set to true. We may try setting the nop flag to true in the future if the repo is archived by the Archive plugin, but for the purposes of avoiding the rate limit this should be fine.