-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Optimize job __hash__ and __eq__ checks. #442
Merged
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d886455
Optimize job __hash__ and __eq__ checks.
bdice e4d22f8
Update changelog.
bdice 336315d
Use id instead of working directory for hash, because it can cause pr…
bdice e3cea09
Remove strict guarantees in tests about job hashes.
bdice 941a2fb
Test that hashes are equal when the jobs are equal.
bdice fb643ca
Use id instead of hash for equality pre-test.
bdice ef7cc60
Merge branch 'master' into feature/optimize-job-hash-eq
bdice 0179c46
Merge branch 'master' into feature/optimize-job-hash-eq
bdice File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So this test fails under the new changes since it only failed since the working directories for
job
andjob_b
were differentThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, this fails because of the relaxed definition of the
hash
function.job == job_b
implies thathash(job) == hash(job_b)
, but the logical inverse (job != job_b
⏩hash(job) != hash(job_b)
) does not hold. In the Python data model, it is fine for objects to be non-equal and have the same hash.