Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update libdecor source link in FAQ and package name to dev package #1085

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 25, 2023

Conversation

JJRcop
Copy link
Collaborator

@JJRcop JJRcop commented Jul 23, 2023

Update link from https://gitlab.gnome.org/jadahl/libdecor to https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/libdecor/libdecor
Change package name from libdecor to libdecor-0-dev to help those that may install the non-devel dependency.

@netboy3
Copy link
Contributor

netboy3 commented Jul 23, 2023

Also explicitly include libdecor-0-0 to eliminate reliance on the Debian dependency relationship between them.

Why? I thought we only list the necessary packages and not include their dependency path. All library dev packages will always have a dependency on their runtime shared library package. If we decide to change the process to "eliminate reliance on the Debian dependency relationship", we have to add the non-dev packages throughout the documentation as they are all missing.

@JJRcop
Copy link
Collaborator Author

JJRcop commented Jul 23, 2023

Why? I thought we only list the necessary packages and not include their dependency path. All library dev packages will always have a dependency on their runtime shared library package.

Of course! It slipped my mind at the time. Maybe not a great thing to happen to the documentation guy, but thanks for the reminder.

Also change package name to Debian
package libdecor-0-dev
@gnif gnif merged commit 219c73e into gnif:master Jul 25, 2023
16 checks passed
@JJRcop JJRcop deleted the libdecor-faq-update branch July 25, 2023 07:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants