chore(gnovm): add missing packages to stdlibWhitelist
#1677
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
notJoon
requested review from
jaekwon,
piux2,
thehowl and
moul
as code owners
thehowl
approved these changes
Feb 22, 2024
thehowl
changed the title
stdlibWhiteliststdlibWhitelist
Thank you. I'll burn this later. |
leohhhn
pushed a commit
to leohhhn/gno
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 29, 2024
## Description While I was working the [JSON](gnolang#1415), @harry-hov requested to update the package list. After checking, I noticed that multiple packages were absent from the list, so I include them. However, I omitted the testing package, as it appeared to be managed independently.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
While I was working the JSON, got a requested to update the package list. After checking, I noticed that multiple packages were absent from the list, so I include them.
However, I omitted the testing package, as it appeared to be managed independently.
Originally posted by @harry-hov in #1415 (comment)