-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 988
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
middleware: add Discard method to WrapResponseWriter #926
Merged
VojtechVitek
merged 5 commits into
go-chi:master
from
patrislav:wrap-response-writer-discard
Jun 28, 2024
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5a95c0a
middleware: add Discard method to WrapResponseWriter
patrislav 57e0153
resolve review comments
patrislav 1f71a5f
use ioutil.Discard and deprecate the public interface
patrislav eeac37c
move the Discard method back to the public interface
patrislav 91f4808
discard calls to WriteHeader too
patrislav File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is technically a breaking API change -- if there's anyone who implemented this interface externally. But I can't think of any use case why would anyone do that. And it's an easy fix.
So, I'm OK with this change if we bump minor version only. I just wanted to call it out for visibility.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thinking of this some more, I think we could achieve backward-compatibility by
wrapResponseWriter
that extends the original interface with the newDiscard()
method.NewWrapResponseWriter()
constructorI don't see a reason why we'd need to return a public interface in this case. I don't expect anyone re-implementing
wrapResponseWriter
externally?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You're right, I suppose the issue is not people implementing the interface (as they're free to do that) but rather using it to type variables or function arguments. IMO in that case the correct way would rather be to use the
http.ResponseWriter
or define a custom interface with the methods they need.Good idea with the private interface, wouldn't it be confusing with the now two similarly named interfaces though?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FYI: We decided to update the original interface, as we don't expect anyone using it directly for anything.