Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SyncExternalUsers is deactivating ldap users #3815

Closed
2 of 7 tasks
junkb opened this issue Apr 18, 2018 · 51 comments
Closed
2 of 7 tasks

SyncExternalUsers is deactivating ldap users #3815

junkb opened this issue Apr 18, 2018 · 51 comments

Comments

@junkb
Copy link

junkb commented Apr 18, 2018

Description

i've set up and am using ldap authentication. this seems to be working fine. users in the specified ldap group are able to log in, and are able to use the system. upon a new user's initial login, they are active, and the user management panel confirms this.

however, once SyncExternalUsers runs, it decides all ldap users need to be deactivated, and does so [see logs referenced above].

once this happens, the user is still able to log in, but is shown in the user management panel as inactive, and cannot be seen by other users [for example, in explore -> users].

users can be manually reactivated, by editing that user's settings in the user management panel, and the user is then again visible, etc., but as soon as SyncExternalUsers runs again, it deactivates everyone.

@lafriks
Copy link
Member

lafriks commented Apr 19, 2018

Do you have user filter set (&(objectclass=user)(samaccountname=*)(memberof=cn=vcs_users,ou=groups,dc=example,dc=com))?

@lafriks lafriks added the type/question Issue needs no code to be fixed, only a description on how to fix it yourself. label Apr 19, 2018
@lafriks
Copy link
Member

lafriks commented Apr 19, 2018

It should be (&(objectclass=user)(samaccountname=%s)(memberof=cn=vcs_users,ou=groups,dc=example,dc=com))

@junkb
Copy link
Author

junkb commented Apr 19, 2018

no asterisk in the actual filter, no [see screen shot] - that's only appearing in the log output

i don't know go really at all, but could that asterisk be coming from

https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/master/modules/auth/ldap/ldap.go#L293 ?

it looks like userFilter might be getting explicitly set with a literal '*'?

filters

@junkb
Copy link
Author

junkb commented Apr 28, 2018

what else can i do to troubleshoot this further?

@s-hamann
Copy link
Contributor

s-hamann commented May 4, 2018

I experienced similar behaviour until I set the username attribute to sAMAccountName. Does not seem to be as optional as the docs indicate (for AD environments, at least).

@hexathos
Copy link

setting username to sAMAaccountName didn't help... my gitea installation with active directory backend is still deactivating users... same goes for the instance with openldap backend... ;c(

@lafriks
Copy link
Member

lafriks commented May 13, 2018

I can't seem to reproduce that

@hexathos
Copy link

I am not that fine with go... but
524885d#diff-5b36fdb03ccb6b7625fd57a6c675051dR309

returned two bools (which i assume was isadmin and isactive) while search result returns just isadmin

@liquidat
Copy link

I can verify the issue - upon each run of SyncExternalUsers the LDAP user is deactivated. However I fail to reproduce the log message mentioned above, even in Debug mode!

My user filter is much simpler: (&(objectclass=person)(uid=%s)) It is running against a freeipa LDAP server.

  • Gitea version (or commit ref): e6b0a2d
  • Git version: git version 2.15.0
  • Operating system: docker container gitea/gitea:latest running on CentOS
  • Database (use [x]):
    • PostgreSQL
    • MySQL
    • MSSQL
    • SQLite
  • Can you reproduce the bug at https://try.gitea.io:
    • Yes (provide example URL)
    • No
    • Not relevant

@okimiko
Copy link

okimiko commented May 31, 2018

I can verfiy the issue, too. I reverted to an older image.

  • Gitea version (or commit ref): docker -> 6015731584f2
  • Git version: n/a
  • Operating system: n/a docker
  • Database (use [x]):
    • PostgreSQL
    • MySQL
    • MSSQL
    • SQLite

@sapk
Copy link
Member

sapk commented May 31, 2018

We should maybe raise this issue to kind/bug tag and add to 1.5.0 release ?

@lafriks
Copy link
Member

lafriks commented May 31, 2018

I can not seem to reproduce this bug with either MS AD or OpenLDAP :(

@liquidat
Copy link

@lafriks Any idea how we could further debug the problem? I am using the pre-build docker container.

Also, in #3815 (comment) you mentioned that the filter should contain samaccountname and memberof - is this a requirement? As mentioned above I use a rather simple filter, maybe that's the problem?

@lafriks
Copy link
Member

lafriks commented May 31, 2018

@liquidat I'm testing OpenLDAP with same configuration as in tests: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/master/integrations/auth_ldap_test.go#L99

@liquidat
Copy link

liquidat commented Jun 7, 2018

I realized that even if I add an admin filter which should match my user, the user is not an admin afterwards.
Maybe the ldap sync for some reason does not manage find the users? Is there any way to get more debug output of the sync in the current container build, like how many users were found?

@yamss
Copy link

yamss commented Jun 7, 2018

I'm having the same issue. This behavior started maybe a week ago... everything was fine before. I updated my docker image one week before this started to happen.

@lafriks
Copy link
Member

lafriks commented Jun 7, 2018

Can you please give your LDAP source configuration and LDAP server software being used.

@lafriks lafriks added the issue/needs-feedback For bugs, we need more details. For features, the feature must be described in more detail label Jun 7, 2018
@yamss
Copy link

yamss commented Jun 7, 2018

  • Gitea version (or commit ref): Docker 1.4.2
  • Git version: n/a
  • Operating system: CentOS 7
  • Database (use [x]):
  • PostgreSQL
  • MySQL
  • MSSQL
  • SQLite

Using MS Active Directory:

User Filter= (sAMAccountName=%s)
Admin Filter= (&(objectCategory=Person)(memberOf=CN=GU_TSC,OU=Grupos,DC=lc,DC=gc,DC=local))

@liquidat
Copy link

@lafriks Was this a request to provide feedback meant that everyone with this bug should answer, or only @yamss ?

@lafriks
Copy link
Member

lafriks commented Jun 12, 2018

@liquidat everyone can provide, the more cases are provided the better chances to find where is the problem

@liquidat
Copy link

LDAP Source configuration:

  • Authentication Type: LDAP (via BindDN)
  • Authentication Name: IDM
  • Security Protocol: Unencrypted
  • Host: idm-c
  • Port: 389
  • Bind DN: uid=system,cn=sysaccounts,cn=etc,dc=bayz,dc=de
  • Bind Password: (encrypted)
  • User Search Base: cn=users,cn=accounts,dc=bayz,dc=de
  • User Filter: (&(objectClass=inetOrgPerson)(memberOf=cn=users,cn=accounts,dc=bayz,dc=de)(uid=%s))
  • Admin Filter: (&(objectclass=person)(uid=%s))
  • Username Attribute: rwo
  • Email Attribute: mail
  • Enable User Synchronization
  • This Authentication Source is Activated

LDAP Server software:

  • freeipa-server-4.4.4-4.fc26.x86_64

@junkb
Copy link
Author

junkb commented Jun 14, 2018

i've just experienced some additional developments wrt to this issue. today, for the first time, i performed a git operation using ssh rather than http, and observed the following symptom:

>git clone --verbose 'vcs:example/foo.git'
Cloning into 'foo'...
Gitea: Your account is not active or has been disabled by Administrator
User jdoe is disabled and have no access to repository example/foo.git
fatal: Could not read from remote repository.

if i activate the user manually [e.g. via the admin panel], the symptom is gone and i'm able to perform operations successfully. after the scheduled task runs and the user gets deactivated, the symptom reappears. git operations via https don't exhibit this symptom. they work even with the user inactive, in the same way i can log into the web ui, even with an inactive user.

@junkb
Copy link
Author

junkb commented Jun 14, 2018

here are my configuration details [i'm sorry, i've had to mask some particulars]

  • authentication type: ldap [via bind dn]
  • authentication name: example.com
  • security protocol: unencrypted
  • host: dsa1.example.com
  • port: 389
  • bind dn: vcs01-gitea@example.com
  • bind password: *************
  • user search base: ou=users,dc=example,dc=com
  • user filter: (&(objectclass=user)(samaccountname=%s)(memberof=cn=vcs_users,ou=security_groups,dc=example,dc=com)(!(UserAccountControl:1.2.840.113556.1.4.803:=2)))
  • admin filter: (memberof=cn=vcs_admins,ou=security_groups,dc=example,dc=com)
  • username attribute: samaccountname
  • first name attribute: givenname
  • surname attribute: cn
  • email attribute: mail
  • fetch attributes in bind dn context
  • enable user synchronization
  • this authentication is activated

the directory server is microsoft active directory, running on windows server 2008 r2 datacenter 64 bit service pack 1

@armin1402
Copy link

We got the same issue here with OpenLDAP

Authentication Type: LDAP (via BindDN)
Authentication Name: gitea
Security Protocol: LDAPS
Host: IP (x.x.x.x)
Port: 7636
Bind DN: uid=XXXXXXXX,cn=users,dc=XXXXXX,dc=de
Bind Password: XXXXXXXXX
User Search Base: cn=users,dc=XXXXXXXX,dc=de
User Filter: (uid=%s)
Admin Filter: XXXXXXXX
Username Attribute: empty
Email Attribute: mail

  • Enable User Synchronization
  • This Authentication Source is Activated

Logfile


Jun 21 14:29:55 FQDN gitea[740]: 2018/06/21 14:29:55 [T] Bound as BindDN uid=svc_gitea,cn=users,dc=XXXXXXX,dc=de
Jun 21 14:29:55 FQDN gitea[740]: 2018/06/21 14:29:55 [T] Fetching attributes '', '', '', 'mail' with filter (uid=*) and base cn=users,dc=XXXXXX,dc=de
Jun 21 14:29:55 FQDN gitea[740]: 2018/06/21 14:29:55 [T] SyncExternalUsers[svc_gitea]: Deactivating user XXXX.XXXX
Jun 21 14:29:55 FQDN gitea[740]: 2018/06/21 14:29:55 [I] [SQL] UPDATE `user` SET `is_active` = ?, `updated_unix` = ? WHERE `id`=? []interface {}{false, 1529584195, 3}
Jun 21 14:29:55 FQDN gitea[740]: 2018/06/21 14:29:55 [T] SyncExternalUsers[svc_gitea]: Deactivating user XXXX.XXXX
Jun 21 14:29:55 FQDN gitea[740]: 2018/06/21 14:29:55 [I] [SQL] UPDATE `user` SET `is_active` = ?, `updated_unix` = ? WHERE `id`=? []interface {}{false, 1529584195, 6}
Jun 21 14:29:55 FQDN gitea[740]: 2018/06/21 14:29:55 [T] SyncExternalUsers[svc_gitea]: Deactivating user XXXX.XXXX
Jun 21 14:29:55 FQDN gitea[740]: 2018/06/21 14:29:55 [I] [SQL] UPDATE `user` SET `is_active` = ?, `updated_unix` = ? WHERE `id`=? []interface {}{false, 1529584195, 10}
Jun 21 14:29:55 FQDN gitea[740]: 2018/06/21 14:29:55 [T] SyncExternalUsers[svc_gitea]: Deactivating user XXXX.XXXX
Jun 21 14:29:55 FQDN gitea[740]: 2018/06/21 14:29:55 [I] [SQL] UPDATE `user` SET `is_active` = ?, `updated_unix` = ? WHERE `id`=? []interface {}{false, 1529584195, 12}

@armin1402
Copy link

It seems this isse comes up, if you do the following:

  • Install gitea
  • create local users
  • connect gitea to ldap
  • use existing accounts

then the userid doesnt match to id.

Maybe it would make more sense, to check in ldap the username (uid, samaccountname) instead of using an id.

@junkb
Copy link
Author

junkb commented Jun 23, 2018

in my case, the only local account is the administrator account. there are no other local accounts.

@xoxys
Copy link
Contributor

xoxys commented Aug 6, 2018

@lafriks Any news? The complete notification stack (Gitea/Mail) is broken as a result of this behavior...

@lafriks
Copy link
Member

lafriks commented Oct 25, 2018

@KimonHoffmann you can set in LDAP auth source to use paged search, this would fix size limit exceeded error.

@KimonHoffmann
Copy link

@lafriks yes, I know, sorry for not clearly expressing what I was trying to say.

I was trying to give other people who are struggling with this error a hint on what may cause it.

What I meant to say was that in my case the fact that the Active-flags were not synchronized from LDAP was a side effect of the sync job never running to completion, because it aborted prematurely with the "Size limit exceeded" error.

Once I fixed the latter by enabling paging in the LDAP config, the Active flags were synchronized as expected.

@tonysgi
Copy link

tonysgi commented Dec 5, 2018

@KimonHoffmann I set the paging size 1000 and 2000 but I am still getting my users deactivated from Active Directory. What paging size did you use?

@KimonHoffmann
Copy link

@tonysgi: I have the paging set to the rather low value of 200.

Please note that you can easily determine, whether or not the page size is the problem by looking for the "Size limit exceeded" message in the log, while performing a synchronization.

I might be wrong in my assessment, but from what I've learned while investigating this problem on my installation is that the synchronization process appears to first fetch all user records and if that succeeded synchronizes the active flags in a second step. So any error that makes the first step not run to completion causes the active flags to be reset.

Having a look into the logfile while the synchronization is in progress could yield pointers on what your specific problem may be.

@huapox
Copy link

huapox commented Jan 22, 2019

same problem! help wanted. #4402

@lafriks lafriks added type/bug and removed type/question Issue needs no code to be fixed, only a description on how to fix it yourself. issue/needs-feedback For bugs, we need more details. For features, the feature must be described in more detail labels Jan 22, 2019
@HarryHHung
Copy link

In my case my problem was solved by case-sensitively setting user attributes as in the following list.

http://www.kouti.com/tables/userattributes.htm

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Apr 27, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs during the next 2 weeks. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the issue/stale label Apr 27, 2019
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented May 11, 2019

This issue has been automatically closed because of inactivity. You can re-open it if needed.

@stale stale bot closed this as completed May 11, 2019
@meskio
Copy link

meskio commented Jun 28, 2019

We are hitting this same issue. I don't think is solved.

Our log says when it disables all our users:

 [...gitea/models/user.go:1649 SyncExternalUsers()] [E] LDAP Search failed unexpectedly! (LDAP Result Code 4 "Size Limit Exceeded": )

I check and our openldap server is configured with oclSizeLimit = 100, and on the gitea side we have marked it to Use Paged Search with Page Size = 50. Our ldap contains ~550 accounts. We have the Username attribute set to uid.

Any ideas of how I can help to solve this issue? Things to look into? Tests that will be useful for that?

@lafriks lafriks reopened this Jun 30, 2019
@stale stale bot removed the issue/stale label Jun 30, 2019
@lafriks
Copy link
Member

lafriks commented Jun 30, 2019

What version are you using?

@meskio
Copy link

meskio commented Jul 1, 2019

We compiled ourselves gitea using the tag 1.8.3.

@clawoflight
Copy link

same problem here, it only works if I manually specify the username attribute.

My guess is that there is a bug in the search code compared to the authentication :)

@IonicEcko
Copy link

I am also having this issue.

Latest docker, really small MS AD (its a lab), every time the sync runs it deactivates my user. Happy to grab any logs etc needed if you can mention what and where.

@lafriks
Copy link
Member

lafriks commented Aug 7, 2019

please check gitea.log for any errors/warnings related to LDAP sync

@IonicEcko
Copy link

No errors that I can see but the mess of SQL queries makes it hard to tell. I ran an update though to replicate the issue and the only bit that looked out of place was:

2019/08/07 08:03:20 ...rm/session_update.go:375:Update() [I] [SQL] UPDATE "user" SET "is_active" = ?, "updated_unix" = ? WHERE "id"=? []interface {}{false, 1565165000, 7}

For reference (because I never discount my own stupidity) my settings are below. I ended up having to remove the admin filter because it never seemed to work and the user filter had to be simplified and switched from sAMAccountName to SamAccountName to match AD (with sAM it just didnt work at all).

If thats wrong, my apologies.

LDAP definitely works (my AD password works - even after deleting the account). But it deactives the account on every sync.
image

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Oct 6, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs during the next 2 weeks. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the issue/stale label Oct 6, 2019
@lafriks
Copy link
Member

lafriks commented Oct 6, 2019

Imho this should be resolved on master branch

@lafriks lafriks closed this as completed Oct 6, 2019
@s-hell
Copy link

s-hell commented Oct 28, 2019

I have the same problem.
Started withe 1.9.3, updated to 1.9.4 and compiled the master branch. All the same error.

We are using gitea with:

ssh=2.16.5
DB=mysql
OS=CentOS7.7

@faekz0r
Copy link

faekz0r commented Jan 31, 2020

No errors that I can see but the mess of SQL queries makes it hard to tell. I ran an update though to replicate the issue and the only bit that looked out of place was:

2019/08/07 08:03:20 ...rm/session_update.go:375:Update() [I] [SQL] UPDATE "user" SET "is_active" = ?, "updated_unix" = ? WHERE "id"=? []interface {}{false, 1565165000, 7}

For reference (because I never discount my own stupidity) my settings are below. I ended up having to remove the admin filter because it never seemed to work and the user filter had to be simplified and switched from sAMAccountName to SamAccountName to match AD (with sAM it just didnt work at all).

If thats wrong, my apologies.

LDAP definitely works (my AD password works - even after deleting the account). But it deactives the account on every sync.
image

Try being case sensitive, like this: sAMAccountName

@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 24, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests