Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

update code.gitea.io/git in vendor to fix delete branch fails #2250

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 3, 2017
Merged

update code.gitea.io/git in vendor to fix delete branch fails #2250

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 3, 2017

Conversation

lafriks
Copy link
Member

@lafriks lafriks commented Aug 3, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Fixes #2245
Replaces #2248

@lafriks lafriks changed the title update code.gitea.io/git in vendor to fix #2245 update code.gitea.io/git in vendor to fix delete branch fails Aug 3, 2017
@lafriks lafriks added this to the 1.2.0 milestone Aug 3, 2017
@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented Aug 3, 2017

LGTM

@tboerger tboerger added the lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. label Aug 3, 2017
@sapk
Copy link
Member

sapk commented Aug 3, 2017

LGTM

@tboerger tboerger added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Aug 3, 2017
@lunny lunny merged commit a4ca544 into go-gitea:master Aug 3, 2017
@lafriks lafriks deleted the update_vendor branch September 13, 2017 06:13
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 23, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. type/bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.2.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Can't delete branch after Pull Request is granted
4 participants
@lafriks @lunny @sapk @tboerger