Utilise byteSlice as a part of struct to avoid allocations

[moredure]

See more details see https://gist.github.com/moredure/4e6b7a1dcd7e0f2d857ca605caf53833

[lance6716]

Hi, can you explain what's the benefit of this change? I'm not sure what you want to improve, maybe *[]byte is better than *struct{ []byte }

[moredure]

from code quality perspective struct is more simple, *[]byte needed to be dereferenced first, but original link to the slice pointer should be returned back to the pool

[lance6716]

from code quality perspective struct is more simple, *[]byte needed to be dereferenced first, but original link to the slice pointer should be returned back to the pool

Yes, I just can't understand which part contributes to the title "Utilise byteSlice as a part of struct to avoid allocations". In this PR I guess you want to avoid allocating the slice header for []byte? And remove the 10-length channel just keep same style as #682 ?

[moredure]

Exactly, slice header + channel of size 10.

[lance6716]

wait some days for @atercattus online

[atercattus]

lgtm too. Thank you for waiting for me :)