Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix lint and style errors #322

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ikimonogakari
Copy link

@ikimonogakari ikimonogakari commented Nov 1, 2024

Found minor lint errors.

  • metadata/decode.go
    • chain is nil when accessing its 0 index item. Create a new slice to avoid nil access.
  • protocol/attestation_apple.go
    • err has been checked not nil in the preceding if statement, and cannot be nil again.
  • Some style errors, need a space after // comment.

@ikimonogakari ikimonogakari requested a review from a team as a code owner November 1, 2024 18:41
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 1, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces several modifications across multiple files, primarily focusing on error handling and formatting adjustments. Notably, the DecodeBytes method in metadata/decode.go has been updated to ensure proper initialization of the chain variable when the HeaderX509Certificate attribute is absent. In protocol/attestation_apple.go, an error check related to nonce verification has been removed, simplifying the control flow. Minor formatting changes were made in protocol/client.go and protocol/options.go, primarily to improve comment clarity. The overall functionality and logic of the affected components remain unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
metadata/decode.go Modified DecodeBytes to initialize chain as a slice containing d.root when HeaderX509Certificate is missing.
protocol/attestation_androidkey_test.go Commented out code in TestVerifyAndroidKeyFormat that checked equality of got1 and tt.want1 using reflect.DeepEqual.
protocol/attestation_apple.go Removed error check in verifyAppleFormat for nonce verification after asn1.Unmarshal, simplifying the condition.
protocol/client.go Minor formatting adjustments and clarified comments in the CollectedClientData struct.
protocol/options.go Minor formatting adjustments in comments for AttestationFormatPacked constant.

Possibly related PRs

  • feat(metadata)!: rework as a provider #239: The changes in the metadata/decode.go file regarding the DecodeBytes method and the handling of the chain variable are related to the overall rework of metadata handling proposed in this PR, which includes modifications to how metadata is parsed and validated.

Poem

🐰 In the meadow where code does play,
Changes hop in a bright new way.
Chains are set, errors are few,
With comments clear, we’ll see it through.
A dance of logic, a waltz of code,
In the rabbit's burrow, new paths unfold! 🌼


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e817853 and 20af933.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • metadata/decode.go (1 hunks)
  • protocol/attestation_androidkey_test.go (1 hunks)
  • protocol/attestation_apple.go (1 hunks)
  • protocol/client.go (1 hunks)
  • protocol/options.go (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • protocol/client.go
  • protocol/options.go
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 golangci-lint
protocol/attestation_androidkey_test.go

61-61: File is not goimports-ed with -local github.com/go-webauthn/webauthn

(goimports)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
protocol/attestation_apple.go (1)

80-80: LGTM! Simplified condition is correct.

The removal of the redundant error check is appropriate since any potential asn1.Unmarshal errors are already handled in the preceding lines (78-79). This change improves code clarity without compromising safety.

metadata/decode.go (1)

112-112: LGTM: Proper slice initialization improves code safety.

The change correctly initializes the chain slice when the x5c header is missing, which is safer than direct index assignment. This ensures proper certificate chain validation when falling back to the metadata TOC signing trust anchor.

Let's verify the certificate chain validation logic remains intact:

✅ Verification successful

Slice initialization change is correct and maintains chain validation integrity

The code change properly handles the fallback case when x5c is missing by initializing the certificate chain with the root certificate. The surrounding context shows that:

  1. The chain validation logic remains intact with proper validation against the metadata TOC signing trust anchor
  2. The chain is correctly used for subsequent certificate parsing and validation
  3. The change maintains the expected behavior while improving code safety
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that certificate chain validation is properly tested
# Test: Search for test cases covering missing x5c header scenario
rg -A 10 "TestDecode.*" --type go

Length of output: 35


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for test files and certificate chain validation tests
fd ".*_test.go$" --exec rg -l "x5c|chain|certificate"

# Also search for the decode implementation to understand the chain validation
rg -A 10 "func.*DecodeBytes" --type go

Length of output: 922


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the full context of the decode implementation and chain validation
rg -B 5 -A 20 "chain\s*=.*\[\]any" metadata/decode.go

# Also search for any related test cases in the metadata package
fd "metadata/.*_test.go$" --exec rg -l "TestDecode|x5c|chain"

Length of output: 993


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant