Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Changes to NameIDFormat descriptor build logic in metadata generation. #11614

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

nicolas-semaphor
Copy link
Contributor

This is a small proposal to change how the NameIDFormat descriptor is appended to SAML service provider metadata, as a fix to this issue. While messing with the metadata.py processor, I also noticed that the namespace for the X509SubjectName format seems to contain the wrong SAML version number, as specified in the SAML 2 core specification.

I've tested locally on the newest ( 2024.8.3 ) release.

@nicolas-semaphor nicolas-semaphor requested a review from a team as a code owner October 4, 2024 12:00
Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 4, 2024

Deploy Preview for authentik-storybook canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 2f39706
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/authentik-storybook/deploys/66ffd8df2b75560009a525c3

Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 4, 2024

Deploy Preview for authentik-docs canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 2f39706
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/authentik-docs/deploys/66ffd8df2cb6e60008040a44

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.75%. Comparing base (5257370) to head (2f39706).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #11614      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.76%   92.75%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         736      736              
  Lines       36542    36539       -3     
==========================================
- Hits        33897    33893       -4     
- Misses       2645     2646       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 49.26% <33.33%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
integration 24.98% <16.66%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
unit 90.26% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant