-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🩹 fix: Close File After SaveFileToStorage #3197
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new method, Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant DefaultCtx
participant Storage
User->>DefaultCtx: Upload file
DefaultCtx->>DefaultCtx: Open and read file
DefaultCtx->>Storage: Save file to storage
Storage-->>DefaultCtx: Confirm save
DefaultCtx-->>User: Return success or error
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
ctx.go (1)
Line range hint
1473-1484
: Consider using streaming for better memory efficiencyThe current implementation reads the entire file into memory using
io.ReadAll
, which could be problematic for large files. Consider implementing a streaming solution if the Storage interface supports it.Here's a suggested streaming implementation:
-content, err := io.ReadAll(file) -if err != nil { - return fmt.Errorf("failed to read: %w", err) -} - -if err := storage.Set(path, content, 0); err != nil { +if err := storage.SetStream(path, file, 0); err != nil { return fmt.Errorf("failed to store: %w", err) }Note: This assumes the Storage interface has or can add a
SetStream
method that accepts anio.Reader
. If not, the current implementation is acceptable but consider documenting the memory usage characteristics.🧰 Tools
🪛 golangci-lint
1473-1473: Error return value of
file.Close
is not checked(errcheck)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
ctx.go
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 golangci-lint
ctx.go
1473-1473: Error return value of file.Close
is not checked
(errcheck)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
ctx.go (1)
Line range hint 1474-1484
: LGTM: Well-structured error handling
The error handling pattern is well-implemented with:
- Proper error wrapping using
fmt.Errorf
and%w
- Clear and descriptive error messages
- Good error context preservation
🧰 Tools
🪛 golangci-lint
1473-1473: Error return value of file.Close
is not checked
(errcheck)
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3197 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 82.69% 82.72% +0.03%
==========================================
Files 114 114
Lines 11149 11151 +2
==========================================
+ Hits 9220 9225 +5
+ Misses 1527 1525 -2
+ Partials 402 401 -1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Congrats on merging your first pull request! 🎉 We here at Fiber are proud of you! If you need help or want to chat with us, join us on Discord https://gofiber.io/discord |
Description
Type of change