Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add link from python docs page to gcloud-java #1096

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 26, 2015

Conversation

ajkannan
Copy link

The python docs page needs to link back to gcloud-java docs. There's a wrinkle though; gcloud-java uses javadoc, which is a completely different template compared to other languages' docs pages (see http://googlecloudplatform.github.io/gcloud-java/site/0.0.7/apidocs/index.html). The javadocs page also doesn't have a link back to other languages' docs, and there isn't a stable link to redirect to the latest version's javadocs page (though could be added if needed).

This PR proposes linking back to the gcloud-java landing page instead of the javadoc. Thoughts? cc/ @jgeewax

@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Aug 26, 2015
@ajkannan ajkannan added the docs label Aug 26, 2015
@dhermes
Copy link
Contributor

dhermes commented Aug 26, 2015

LGTM

dhermes added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2015
Add link from python docs page to gcloud-java
@dhermes dhermes merged commit fc5443b into googleapis:master Aug 26, 2015
@dhermes
Copy link
Contributor

dhermes commented Aug 27, 2015

@ajkannan Does #1095 (comment) change the link? If so, please submit a new PR.

/cc @jgeewax

@ajkannan
Copy link
Author

It doesn't change the link (I went with the landing page link in this PR).

@dhermes
Copy link
Contributor

dhermes commented Aug 27, 2015

Great!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants