Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use runtime specific topic names in Pub/Sub system tests. #1376

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 20, 2016

Conversation

dhermes
Copy link
Contributor

@dhermes dhermes commented Jan 9, 2016

Fixes #1363.


@tseaver Note #1370 does the same for datastore. Should we do the same for storage and bigquery? At the very least we should re-visit retries (especially for doing a "clean up everything" in tearDownModule) so that our system tests don't leave resources around.

@dhermes dhermes added testing api: pubsub Issues related to the Pub/Sub API. labels Jan 9, 2016
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Jan 9, 2016
@dhermes
Copy link
Contributor Author

dhermes commented Jan 9, 2016

Our merge build success has been about 50% recently, with all failures caused by system test failures:

screen_shot_002

@dhermes dhermes changed the title Use runtime specific topic names in Pub/SUb system tests. Use runtime specific topic names in Pub/Sub system tests. Jan 14, 2016
@dhermes
Copy link
Contributor Author

dhermes commented Jan 15, 2016

@tseaver PTAL

@tseaver
Copy link
Contributor

tseaver commented Jan 20, 2016

LGTM

dhermes added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 20, 2016
Use runtime specific topic names in Pub/Sub system tests.
@dhermes dhermes merged commit 411fd38 into googleapis:master Jan 20, 2016
@dhermes dhermes deleted the fix-1363 branch January 20, 2016 18:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api: pubsub Issues related to the Pub/Sub API. cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. testing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants